[ 3 / a / adv / an / asp / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / g / gd / int / jp / k / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / o / out / p / po / sci / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wsg / x]

/lit/ board - Literature - August 2014

Threads by date

<< back

31st August 2014
30th August 2014
29th August 2014
28th August 2014
27th August 2014
26th August 2014
25th August 2014
24th August 2014
23rd August 2014
22nd August 2014
21st August 2014
20th August 2014
19th August 2014
18th August 2014
17th August 2014
16th August 2014
15th August 2014
14th August 2014
13th August 2014
12th August 2014
11th August 2014
10th August 2014
9th August 2014
8th August 2014
7th August 2014
6th August 2014
5th August 2014
4th August 2014
3rd August 2014
2nd August 2014
1st August 2014

Most viewed threads in this category

0 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
.
? 0 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
?
1 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
Just wrote a book, it's too short to take to any real publishers. 36000 words. So heres my plan Put an audiobook on podiobooks.com Put the book on amazon/B&N self publishing platfroms Have a bunch of my freinds buy the book (ill reimbursethem of course,) and give it 5 star reviews, use a bunch of dummy accounts to give myself 5 star reviews on free platforms go to various subreddits that have subjects my book covers and use dummy accounts to upvote it to various front pages ??? Profit?

Help me get started

54 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
I'm 18 and haven't read much in my life. I've only read about 2/3 books and the last one was like 4 years ago. Even though I'd like to read I just can't get myself to do it. It just bores me and I feel like nothing appeals to me, Basically what I'm asking for is tips on books that will get me hooked. I'd like to read game of thrones but that's just because I think the TV show is quite good but I don't think that'll get me hooked since I already know everything that's going to happen in the first 4 books or so. Please, don't recommend Harry Potter or The Hunger Games
8 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
What are the best 'choose your own adventure' books?

David Graeber

2 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
Dear /lit/eral fags, i approve of David Graeber. This guy nearly gets it all right somehow. His books are amazing from a political, anthropological and general perspective. His 2013/14 contributions to Strike!, The Baffler and The Guardian blew my mind. Any other fanboy around or anyone who has an opinion on Graeber?

What's the most beautiful avant-guarde piano composition?

27 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
I think that possibilities for this title are Maurice Ravel's Jeux d'eau, Erik Satie's Gymnopedie No.1, or Claude Debussy's Reverie? What do you think?
14 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
Knowledge: understanding, information, experience; all things that are based on our capacity to comprehend. 'The more you know, the more you don't know' is a common phrase brought out and paraded about when knowledge is brought up. The mountains of thought that have since been examined, scaled, sculpted and built upon by generations of great thinkers serve as a fantastic repository of ideas, and yet; is this the right path? Some decry philosophy for not providing 'answers' or 'solutions', but that is not the true item of question. Knowledge is the choice that is questioned, but never discarded. Arguing for an inherent meaning to any choice is relatively pointless, but everything has value to someone. Few people would rebuke the offer of valued knowledge, but is that a certain ignorance in itself? What kind of great thinker, those whose judgement is prized upon high, would turn away from knowledge? The real question is: why is knowledge, above all else, the one thing of value to every person? Nothing is more valuable to a person than their capacity for knowledge, how else could we recognise pleasure? Why are all choices in life questionable except sufficient knowledge? Not merely some kind of anti-intellectualism movement against 'academic knowledge', but the CHOICE of knowing. Is the best choice one that cannot be judged? A life of willful ignorance may not be feasible in a society where knowledge is power, but what about dedication to developed instinct? Could we develop a future where people are able to live completely based off instinct, without knowledge? In short: has enough consideration been given to the choice of instinct over knowledge? A life completely based off never knowing any information or having any understanding.
4 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
hello, i am interested in a book that can teach me how to lie. Also any other book that teaches something easy to learn that doesnt take more than a couple of weeks is welcome
Do you think translations of... 15 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
Do you think translations of texts can "lose it" or are there masterfuly done translations? If you can, do you read books in their original languages? What languages do the users of /lit/ know?
>even if you live 200 years... 4 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
>even if you live 200 years you will never read all the books that you want
102 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
Where do I start with DFW? I don't think diving into IJ straight away would be the best move.
32 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
>but if I dont use big words the people on the somalian image board won't think I'm smart
11 posts and 1 image replies omitted. Click to view.
>tfw you already know that the biggest /lit/ meme of 2015 is going to be the David Foster Wallace film adaptation and all we're going to see is endless pictures of Jason Segel's dopey bandana wearing face everywhere
>I read French and Russian... 54 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click to view.
>I read French and Russian literature in English

The categories of existence

31 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
There must be several categories of existence, for as conjectured objects are in a sense other than those which are physically instantiated, they are surely of different "category". I here propose a rough view of the categories of existence: 1) That which is physically instantiated. Such as a chair or a book. 2) That which is possible to be physically instantiated. Such as a thought-made schematic for a chair or a book. 3) Abstract objects that would exist with or without humans. An example is mathematics. 4) Abstract objects that are only possible for humans to construct. An example is the human soul. 5) Fictous things which could not exist even in principle. Such as contradictory systems of thought. 6) That which we will never know, and which can never be, but nevertheless is in an unknowable way. The lower the number of the category, the more it is justified to exist. The higher the number, the more an unsophisticated individual, so to speak, would say that it "does not exist". I would like to flesh these categories out.
21 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
Is it truth that some people go to cafeterias like Starbucks to read? Why would someone do that?
35 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
>Morality, insofar as it condemns for its own sake, and not out of regard for the concerns, considerations, and contrivances of life, is a specific error with which one ought to have no pity—an idiosyncrasy of degenerates which has caused immeasurable harm. Well, was he right /lit/?
4 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
The subject-object contradiction engendered by Fordism became manifest as an opposition between centeredness and fragmentation. On the one hand, individuals in the throes of rationalized Fordist production experienced their lives as objective fragments of a system organized by the alien logic of capitalist rationality. On the other hand, the system of mass consumption gave people the illusion of a private, centered self, insulated from the outside world by family and possessions. This illusion was possible because of the geographic and temporal separation of the fragmentation of work from the centered wholeness of home. This paradox was expressed in modernist works like Franz Kafka's The Trial and Edvard Munch's The Scream, which presumed a centered, autonomous individual, but one who confronted and only sometimes overcame a strange, senseless, impenetrable world.
23 posts and 0 image replies omitted. Click to view.
I can't sleep right now. I need to figure out the name of the word I'm thinking about. It's driving me nuts. Google hasn't helped at all and I figured that you guys could help me out. Thank you for giving me a good nights sleep /lit/ What do you call a general consensus/mood/thought of a time period?
All the content on this website comes from 4chan.org. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster. 4chanArchive is not affiliated with 4chan.