[ 3 / a / adv / an / asp / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / g / gd / int / jp / k / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / o / out / p / po / sci / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wsg / x]

/m/ - Mecha

<< back to board
[Delete this thread]

File: 1404560188999.jpg-(187 KB, 1920x1080)
...
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)23:44 UTC+1 No.11034805 Report

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtRAKeQ1iY8
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)23:51 UTC+1 No.11034833 Report

>CGI shit
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)23:54 UTC+1 No.11034853 Report

whats the plot
>>
Gunlord 07/06/14(Sun)00:44 UTC+1 No.11035204 Report

>>11034853
I saw like the first episode or so when it was posted here. It wasn't subbed, but I think the girl and the male protag are like bounty hunters or something, and they went to a desert planet to kill a lot of giant bugs. Nothing special but nothing too bad either. mite B cool
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)00:50 UTC+1 No.11035239 Report

Characters look like shit (fucking cgi shit...)

Mechs look interesting

Fights look interesting

Will watch three episodes then drop
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)00:52 UTC+1 No.11035248 Report

>>11035239

It's a movie, idiot.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)00:54 UTC+1 No.11035261 Report

>>11035248

Welp, time to not even give it a shot then, if it's had the budget of a film but the characters still look that bad.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)01:04 UTC+1 No.11035305 Report

Why was my post about Miki deleted?
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)01:05 UTC+1 No.11035312 Report

>>11035305
And the shitposting about CGI wasn't. Real nice priorities, janitor.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)01:10 UTC+1 No.11035334 Report

>>11035239
>Characters look like shit (fucking cgi shit...)
I'd rather shows/movies have all CG and have shitty looking characters than try and fail to blend 2d and 3d animation.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)01:11 UTC+1 No.11035337 Report

>>11035305
>>11035312

janitor probably doesn't even know who he is
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)01:17 UTC+1 No.11035367 Report

>>11035305
random animu girl reeking of /a/ probably
at least pick a proper /m/ related reaction image
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)01:21 UTC+1 No.11035381 Report

>>11035367
We're not allowed to post reaction images that aren't /m/ now?
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)01:28 UTC+1 No.11035412 Report

>>11035367
that edited Denpa girl on her desk is a pretty widespread reaction image, janitor.

at least delete shitposts as well if you're going to abuse the function to delete posts that use images you don't like.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)01:36 UTC+1 No.11035442 Report

Janitor is from Afghanistan, ahegao is offensive.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)04:01 UTC+1 No.11035994 Report

>>11034805
Urobuchi and Mizushima. Weird combo.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)09:36 UTC+1 No.11037099 Report

>>11035204
>first episode
It's going to be a movie..
>>
Gunlord 07/06/14(Sun)10:15 UTC+1 No.11037193 Report

>>11037099
My bad, guess it musta been a short clip, then. I remember just watching like 5 mins or so.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)10:29 UTC+1 No.11037225 Report

Nice to see that they still haven't made character 3DCGI as convincing as in IGPX.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)10:41 UTC+1 No.11037250 Report
File: SuchArt.jpg-(125x67)
>>11037225>IGPX>show...
>>11037225
>IGPX
>show is from way back in 2003.
Now that I've been reminded of the existence of IGPX, I feel great shame for the anime industry.

I think they've actually gotten worse at CGI.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)10:49 UTC+1 No.11037268 Report

>>11037250
Well, they did.
In IGPX the characters actually looked drawn, that chick from that show looks like straight out of MMD.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)13:21 UTC+1 No.11037607 Report
File: 1392884126739.jpg-(125x93)
>>11037250THAT's 3D...
>>11037250
THAT's 3D CG?!

Seriously?! That's awesome!
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)13:53 UTC+1 No.11037687 Report
File: IGPXCG.jpg-(125x95)
>>11037607......
>>11037607
... No.

I'm pretty sure he's referring to scenes like this one. Sadly the anime is from 2003, and that's the best shot I could find.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)14:38 UTC+1 No.11037796 Report

>>11034805
I'm sceptical about CGI. Why did they want to use it? Is it cheaper?
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)14:40 UTC+1 No.11037806 Report

>>11035994
This may actually work pretty well. Expect some in-your-face political and social commentary. I like that stuff, so I'm not complaining.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)14:48 UTC+1 No.11037832 Report

>>11037225
>>11037250
>>11037607
That's because the people drawn in IGPX are actually hand drawn the faggots.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)14:53 UTC+1 No.11037842 Report

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFlB93nSs9Y

IGPX had amazing CG considering its age. It still looks better than a lot of CG things airing today. I wonder if it was just special. Like, was there some American company pouring money into it or something?
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)14:56 UTC+1 No.11037857 Report

take off your nostalgia goggles, the CGI looks as bad if not worse than what we have today. they're using the same techniques and technology from a show developed ten years ago. it's expected from a form of media not actively being used and developed.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)15:00 UTC+1 No.11037873 Report

>>11037842
What progressed within CG is lighting simulation Something anime studio never use because they always stick to the forced cell shading.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)15:05 UTC+1 No.11037897 Report
File: cg2.jpg-(125x70)
>>11037687
>>11037687
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)15:11 UTC+1 No.11037924 Report

>>11037897
That's just regular animation with more inbetweens
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)15:14 UTC+1 No.11037934 Report
File: cg3.jpg-(125x70)
>>11037924this too?
>>11037924
this too?
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)15:17 UTC+1 No.11037946 Report

>>11037934
Everything
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)15:18 UTC+1 No.11037952 Report

>>11037934
... It's like I'm looking at a short clip of Sidonia 10 years before it was even made.

Never again will I allow I.G. to get away with shitty CG.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)15:19 UTC+1 No.11037954 Report

>>11037934
Man, I do not remember him turning into Hiyama's Genshiken character. What was that about?
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)15:19 UTC+1 No.11037956 Report

>>11037934
>>11037897
sakuga
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)15:20 UTC+1 No.11037961 Report

>>11037952
>implying this animation is as bad as Sidonia's
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)15:22 UTC+1 No.11037974 Report

>/m/ whining about CG
>can't even tell which is CG and which isn't

A good reminder to never waste my time arguing about CG in /m/
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)15:30 UTC+1 No.11038007 Report

>>11037974
Don't waste your time arguing about CG anywhere. Anyone who uses it as a serious complaint isn't worth paying attention to. While good animation is a nice thing to have, it's hardly a factor if the anime is enjoyable in other regards.
>>
Anonymous 07/07/14(Mon)04:41 UTC+1 No.11041787 Report

>>11034805
sauce?
>>
Anonymous 07/07/14(Mon)04:45 UTC+1 No.11041798 Report

>>11037974
Something something /m/ having strong opinions about a thing it doesn't really understand, express firm but sarcastic disbelief.
>>
Anonymous 07/07/14(Mon)23:45 UTC+1 No.11045763 Report

>>11037897
>>11037934
You've got to admit, that's damn good for its time.
>>
Anonymous 07/08/14(Tue)19:09 UTC+1 No.11049677 Report

bump
All the content on this website comes from 4chan.org. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster. 4chanArchive is not affiliated with 4chan.