[ 3 / a / adv / an / asp / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / g / gd / int / jp / k / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / o / out / p / po / sci / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wsg / x]

/p/ - Photography

<< back to board
[Delete this thread]

Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)19:16 UTC+1 No.2368469 Report

Comments on the editing very welcome, what do you think?
>>
Frose 07/21/14(Mon)19:41 UTC+1 No.2368481 Report

>>2368469
I don't like your edit, and I feel like the crop you made lack of a point of interest. Not that there is nothing to look at, but I love when the lit part is where the eyes are guided and find the face/butt/boobs...
The shadows are heavy and feels "gloomy", really akward for something sensual.

Good idea overall, but would tweak a few things and reshoot. 7/10, best I could do.

>Pic (not mine) related is what I would do

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 20D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2011:08:04 10:37:41
Exposure Time1/30 sec
F-Numberf/16.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/16.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeAverage
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length58.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3504
Image Height2336
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)19:44 UTC+1 No.2368484 Report

>>2368481
>is what I would do

Except you didn't do it. And you have no idea how to do it. And you still couldn't do it if you spent every day from now until the end of time trying it.

Fucking hacks on this board.
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)19:45 UTC+1 No.2368485 Report

>>2368481
So you would say a closer crop? Thanks for taking the time to comment.
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)19:47 UTC+1 No.2368487 Report

>>2368484
lol Most of the comments on here are negative, I've grown to realise that, some of them are constructive, his one I don't believe it to be constructive.
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)19:52 UTC+1 No.2368490 Report

>>2368487
This new crop of tripfags is incapable of being constructive because they just don't know anything. But in all of my years on /p/, I've never seen some retard just post someone else's image and say "SEE THIS IS WHAT I'D DO" while thinking that's any sort of substantial contribution. Fuck me.
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)19:56 UTC+1 No.2368492 Report

>>2368487
>are trolls
ftfy
>>
Frose 07/21/14(Mon)20:00 UTC+1 No.2368495 Report

>>2368485
I typed it, but lost it somehow :
I prefer the version on the left. The picture is more structured and easier to read. But essentially, what I don't like is the direction of the lighting.

More from this set?
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)20:00 UTC+1 No.2368496 Report

>>2368490
I honestly don't think they're trolls, just stuck up their own arse really. The other poster said that I lack a point of interest, I think there's a lot of interest in the pic I posted.
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)20:01 UTC+1 No.2368498 Report

Higher res pic here if anyone is interested: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kamacan/13360291223/
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)20:06 UTC+1 No.2368502 Report

>>2368498
You're not a bad photographer, Kevin. Why do you come to /p/? This place isn't for you. Just look at your thread, dumbfucking shitposting tripfags and anons arguing about the decrease of quality on /p/.
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)20:07 UTC+1 No.2368503 Report

>>2368484

first time posting in this thread, but >>2368481 lighting looks pretty easy, no?

hard hair/rim light behind her like 4 stops brighter than the two front, soft fills, which are about even, 45 degrees to each side and above her? maybe a reflector close underneath her face, pointed up?

thoughts on my assessment?
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)20:08 UTC+1 No.2368505 Report

>>2368496
They're totally not trolls; they genuinely think they're helping and contributing to the board. And that's the worst part.

Just look at this post: >>2368495
nothing but bullshit. a handful of words yet they say nothing at all.
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)20:14 UTC+1 No.2368513 Report

>>2368505
Completely agree, I actually didn't see that post you are referring to. Will throw up some more images in a sec.
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)20:15 UTC+1 No.2368514 Report

>>2368503
The lighting looks pretty easy but does not apply to my image whatsoever.
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)20:20 UTC+1 No.2368517 Report

Here's another of the images, let me know if you want me to post more.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 700D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2014:03:27 22:06:56
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/6.3
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/6.3
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1066
Image Height1600
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)20:24 UTC+1 No.2368523 Report

>>2368495
Can you tell me exactly why you prefer the image on the left? Thanks
>>
Frose 07/21/14(Mon)20:37 UTC+1 No.2368531 Report

>>2368523
Well, pic related. Not enough room around her with OP's edit.

>>2368498
I recognize some of them.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2014:07:21 21:31:03
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1805
Image Height616
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)20:41 UTC+1 No.2368532 Report

>>2368531
Thanks for finding the time to reply, cheers. I do take a lot of this stuff in and learn from it. What do you recognise from them?
>>
Frose 07/21/14(Mon)20:51 UTC+1 No.2368538 Report

>Thanks for finding the time to reply, cheers.
>>2368502
He is half-right. It's hard to criticize someone that is better than the overall of /p/.

>I do take a lot of this stuff in and learn from it
It's really like you don't belong here. But keep posting please.

>>2368532
>What do you recognise from them?
You posted some of them here. Like "Karla Docklands".
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)20:56 UTC+1 No.2368543 Report

>>2368502
>Y
Thanks for the compliments, I come here really to get un-biased and honest feedback on my images, you can't get that anywhere else, you just have to filter out the shitposts. Do I know you?
>>
Anonymous 07/21/14(Mon)20:58 UTC+1 No.2368548 Report

>>2368538
What do you's mean that I don't belong here? Different style or what? Thanks for noticing the Karla Docklands pics and thanks for the compliments.
All the content on this website comes from 4chan.org. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster. 4chanArchive is not affiliated with 4chan.