[ 3 / a / adv / an / asp / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / g / gd / int / jp / k / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / o / out / p / po / sci / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wsg / x]

/p/ - Photography

<< back to board
[Delete this thread]

Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)06:12 UTC+1 No.2356143 Report

Some C&C please first time doing a nude shoot for a girl I met in class this summer, she wanted some stuff for her tumbler.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.4 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2014:07:03 18:58:53
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)06:13 UTC+1 No.2356144 Report

>>2356143

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.4 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2014:07:03 19:34:56
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)06:14 UTC+1 No.2356145 Report

>>2356144

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.4 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2014:07:03 19:37:14
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
NatureBro 07/05/14(Sat)06:15 UTC+1 No.2356146 Report

PROCEED
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)06:22 UTC+1 No.2356148 Report

>tumblr

I hope you fucked her afterwards
>>
Proxiee 07/05/14(Sat)06:23 UTC+1 No.2356149 Report

beautiful model, she looks feisty. Bummer about the shitty location of the shots, but overall its decent enough. Look at bjdrew for inspiration on nude shoots.

>>2356146
>god damnit Reagan. lol
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)06:27 UTC+1 No.2356150 Report

>>2356148
does it count if I did a while before hand?>>2356149
Well she wanted to do it there but I agree
>>
Proxiee 07/05/14(Sat)06:32 UTC+1 No.2356154 Report

>>2356150
you ended up too close to the door, and the shadows are too harsh because of it.
location location location bruddah

also look at the fine works of art that come from Terry.
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)06:42 UTC+1 No.2356157 Report

>>2356154
I don't think i will ever be as good as Terry.
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)06:50 UTC+1 No.2356160 Report

Is that some VSCO shit? It's very grainy.
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)07:02 UTC+1 No.2356165 Report

>>2356160 I don't even have money to afford VSCO bro just a college student trying to get by.
>>
NatureBro 07/05/14(Sat)07:18 UTC+1 No.2356173 Report

Honestly, these look fine for what they are. Like, these fit your stated goal just fine and I dont mean that in a negative way.
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)07:31 UTC+1 No.2356178 Report

>>2356173
I agree with this. They do the thing that they were supposed to do. That said, naked girl pictures are the most boring thing possible conceptually, but that's not OP's fault.
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)09:44 UTC+1 No.2356204 Report

>>2356149

Where can i see bjdrew's work?
cant find him on google
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)09:47 UTC+1 No.2356206 Report

>>2356165
implying anyone actually pays for that shit they call VSCO
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)09:50 UTC+1 No.2356207 Report

>>2356204
I second this
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)11:39 UTC+1 No.2356222 Report

>>2356143

>tumbler

lost it
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)12:17 UTC+1 No.2356230 Report

>>2356154

i really like the harsh shadows

perfect tumblr vibe. good job imo op
>>
Anonymous 07/05/14(Sat)15:44 UTC+1 No.2356319 Report

>>2356165
I'm assuming by that you mean you shot film.
What film did you use?

Also, are all your shots similar, or are there others? I feel like you could have taken some more shots in different locations/ poses.

I'm going to agree with everyone ITT and say that the photos are cliché, but otherwise very good and have a strong tumblr vibe (which is a good thing considering that's where they're going)
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)06:55 UTC+1 No.2356845 Report

>>2356319
Kodak UM 400 but scanned on a shitty printer.
>>
Anonymous 07/06/14(Sun)07:01 UTC+1 No.2356846 Report

So, is that it?
>>
Anonymous 07/08/14(Tue)01:12 UTC+1 No.2357981 Report

>>2356143
>>2356144
>>2356145
are you trolling brah?

because here's the shot i found on tumblr and it sure as hell ain't shot with 400 iso negative film. also the pictures you posted seem vsco'd compared to the ones I found

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height662
>>
Anonymous 07/08/14(Tue)08:08 UTC+1 No.2358238 Report

>>2357981
LMFAO OP is literally one of those faggots who lie

on the internet

for imaginary credit

from strangers
>>
Anonymous 07/08/14(Tue)09:50 UTC+1 No.2358281 Report

>>2358238
>lie
>on the internet
>for imaginary credit
>from strangers

I've been on 4chan since 2007 and while I somewhat understand the mindset of trolls, THIS is the one utterly pathetic thing I'll never understand.
>>
Anonymous 07/08/14(Tue)10:12 UTC+1 No.2358284 Report

>>2357981
OP got #rekt
>>
Anonymous 07/08/14(Tue)11:16 UTC+1 No.2358296 Report

>>2356154
> also look at the fine works of art that come from Terry.
Please don't do that.
>>
Anonymous 07/08/14(Tue)11:27 UTC+1 No.2358299 Report

>>2356143
>>2357981
Maybe it's because of his shitty scanner? I've look at his Tumblr and it's his first "nude" indeed, the rest is only implied nudes.

Anyway, the model barely saves the shot, the framing is way too bad. And "the model wanted to soot here" is no excuse, you're the photographer, you decide where to shoot.
>>
Anonymous 07/08/14(Tue)12:16 UTC+1 No.2358323 Report

>>2358299
>Maybe it's because of his shitty scanner?
do you still believe that?

What scanner, man? The picture in
>>2357981
is either slide film or digital.

If it's really him and he had better scans on his tumblr anyway, why would he post shitty ones?
>>
Anonymous 07/08/14(Tue)17:19 UTC+1 No.2358461 Report

did you sleep with her at least?
>>
Anonymous 07/09/14(Wed)14:40 UTC+1 No.2359143 Report

>>2356143
>>2356144
>>2356145
These are all fucking great. The model seems like a natural in front of the camera. Also, nice minimal setting with soft window light, great editing/processing. 9/10
>>
Anonymous 07/09/14(Wed)14:54 UTC+1 No.2359149 Report

Top marks sir
Beautiful girl
I dig the setting
I dig the vibe

I could care less about the technical. You got a pretty girl naked and she poses very nicely

Lve the first shot with the lines created by her legs and the hips turned
>>
Anonymous 07/09/14(Wed)15:00 UTC+1 No.2359157 Report

>>2356143
>>2356144
>>2356145

link to her tumblr?
>>
Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)11:55 UTC+1 No.2361590 Report

mods are fucking fags
>>
Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)11:56 UTC+1 No.2361592 Report

>>2361590
forgot the picture

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
PhotographerSknds
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>
Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)11:59 UTC+1 No.2361593 Report

>>2359149
>could care less
>>
Anonymous 07/12/14(Sat)12:11 UTC+1 No.2361598 Report

>>2356154
>terry
EVERY.

FUCKING.

THREAD.
>>
Anonymous 07/13/14(Sun)23:34 UTC+1 No.2362492 Report

>>2356143
I dont think op even took these pics. Abort thread.
>>
Anonymous 07/13/14(Sun)23:53 UTC+1 No.2362503 Report

>>2361598
You know he's actually pretty damn relevant to this thread.
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)02:45 UTC+1 No.2362581 Report

>>2361592
>>2357981
pwnt
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)03:45 UTC+1 No.2362602 Report

areolae to cup size ratio is off.

nasty
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)04:10 UTC+1 No.2362617 Report

>>2356173
>via 9gag

Kill yourself.
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)04:11 UTC+1 No.2362619 Report

>>2358281
>I've been on 4chan since 2007

>he's going all out.jpeg
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)06:09 UTC+1 No.2362696 Report

>>2362503
He's not the only person to have ever shot nudes
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)08:11 UTC+1 No.2362740 Report

If they're for her, then really the only opinion that matters is whether or not the client is happy with the photos?
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)11:46 UTC+1 No.2362860 Report

>>2362696
Because that is exactly what I said or implied. The pictures in this thread, whoever took them, are aping Terry's style. Or do you somehow not actually know what his work looks like and just hate him because jezebel told you to?
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)13:08 UTC+1 No.2362884 Report

Hey OP, I'm allowed to jerk off to this, right?

Did she fuck you afterwards? With such intimacy, I'd say why not? Such a nice pussy, tell her I said that.
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)13:38 UTC+1 No.2362892 Report

She looks like she is stripping bout to have her way......so Terry style
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)13:54 UTC+1 No.2362902 Report

Wow found this guys tumblr, makes me feel better about only getting like 5 likes on my shit.

Google image searched his first post.
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)13:59 UTC+1 No.2362906 Report

The shots work, location could be better but it's for tumblr I think it almost adds to the shot that it looks like it was taken in some girls bedroom.

So here is my question, how do you find models?
Other than the ones that approach you?
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)14:46 UTC+1 No.2362928 Report

>>2362619
>>2362902
>>2362906
OP didn't take those pictures and the mods deleted the single post that proved it.

>>2361598
>>2362860
It's not terry's style. Terry's style is white wall, very hard, on-camera-axis shadows. The shadows here are soft compared to that. It might be similar but it's not apeing it.
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)14:56 UTC+1 No.2362931 Report

>>2362928
>It's not terry's style. Terry's style is white wall, very hard, on-camera-axis shadows. The shadows here are soft compared to that. It might be similar but it's not apeing it.
They're 80% his look.
>>
Anonymous 07/14/14(Mon)14:57 UTC+1 No.2362932 Report

>>2362931
They're really not. The light is very different, the wall has distracting detail, and the processing is much to soft. The only thing these have in common with Terry is that it's a pretty girl being "sexy" in a room.
>>
Anonymous 07/17/14(Thu)21:28 UTC+1 No.2365530 Report

>>2362931
seriously, this isn't even close to Richardson. No direct flash, no flash at all as a matter of fact, soft light, no white wall, no model making stupid faces into the camera. The only thing this has in common with a TR shoot is that there's a hot chick in front of the lens. If anything, this looks like everything else on tumblr (not an insult, these are good).
>>
Anonymous 07/17/14(Thu)22:30 UTC+1 No.2365564 Report

>>2362932
>>2365530
Yeah OP can't shoot like Terry the based god of /p/ and should be shamed for getting anywhere near his likeness we get it.
>>
isi 07/17/14(Thu)22:39 UTC+1 No.2365570 Report

>>2365564
No anon, what they're saying is that you're visually illiterate if you think this looks like Terry-style.

Terry was far from the first person to shoot a model in a room against a wall. Subject is not a style. The light and mood of the shoot is absolutely nothing like Terry. That's not a good or a bad thing, it's just a thing- this is not the style of Terry Richardson.

If this were Terry-style, the wall would be nearly or fully white and there'd be some head-on flash. Totally different look unless all you can see if "nude girl in front of a wall"
>>
Anonymous 07/19/14(Sat)10:29 UTC+1 No.2366730 Report

Sauce?
>>
Anonymous 07/19/14(Sat)14:29 UTC+1 No.2366826 Report

>>2366730
>>>/b/
>>>/r/
>Google image search
All the content on this website comes from 4chan.org. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster. 4chanArchive is not affiliated with 4chan.