[ 3 / a / adv / an / asp / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / g / gd / int / jp / k / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / o / out / p / po / sci / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wsg / x]

/vg/ - Video Game Generals - /scg/ Star Citizen General - Missile Meta Edition

<< back to board
[Delete this thread]

File: Missiles.jpg-(124 KB, 1497x842)
/scg/ Star Citizen General -...
/scg/ Star Citizen General - Missile Meta Edition Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:03 UTC+1 No.78457272 Report

>Arena Commander Multiplayer Available To All Citizens
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14066-Arena-Commander-Multiplayer-Available

>Capture the Core Mode Enabled
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14072-Capture-The-Core-Now-Playable

>Arena Commander Controls Help
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/13951-Flight-Model-And-Input-Controls

>Arena Commander Manual
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/uumid5gut1b3mr/source/Arena-Commander-Pilots-Guide-V0-8-02.pdf

>FAQ
http://pastebin.com/fcf25Vi9

>Jump Point Downloads (1 - 20)
http://pastebin.com/Cd9wQ9YB

>Latest Jump Point
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/zxyfitopigfpur/source/JumpPoint_02-07_Jul_14_Horsepower.pdf

>RSI's YouTube Channel (10 for the Chairman/TNGS/Wingmans Hangar + more)
http://www.youtube.com/user/RobertsSpaceInd

>Latest Episodes
10 For the Chairman (#35) http://youtu.be/Uyur8rqbEHc
Around The Universe (#10) http://youtu.be/Fn8qKAV2ATA
Inside CIG (Planetside Art Review) http://youtu.be/BeQfK9hrfDY

>Co-op Multi-crew Constellation fighting off Hornets
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL1RXbZLHAI

>Letter from the Chairman AMD Racing edition
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14102-Letter-From-The-Chairman

>Massive Starfarer Concept art album
http://imgur.com/a/tmoOk#0
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:21 UTC+1 No.78458140 Report

1st for Avadon's guiding light
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:38 UTC+1 No.78459164 Report

Cutlass will appear as single seat ship in arena commander and the turret will be controlled as the rest of the weapons
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:40 UTC+1 No.78459249 Report

>>78459164
Really? They're skipping the multi crew facet and bringing it in directly?

Source on this?

Will it happen to the Freelancer as well?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:42 UTC+1 No.78459414 Report

>>78459249
yes
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:44 UTC+1 No.78459496 Report

>>78459414
[Citation needed]
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:44 UTC+1 No.78459526 Report

>>78459249
Look at the last video of Reverse the Verse
Go to 14:44

This way we will can fly it as a singleseat ship and will be playable before the release of multicrew. IDK about Freelancer but they will do when the forum starts to rage
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:49 UTC+1 No.78459875 Report

>>78459526
>Reverse the Verse
Is that the after-show on twitch? Thanks, I missed that, I'll go check it right now.

That's awesome anon.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:51 UTC+1 No.78459992 Report

>tfw this game will never be a proper polished immersive game only because they picked cryengine when they had no funding
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:52 UTC+1 No.78460023 Report

>>78459526
>>78459875

I cant include link due to anti spam filter...
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:54 UTC+1 No.78460173 Report

>>78460023
>Nueva imagen de mapa de bits.png
my sides
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:56 UTC+1 No.78460321 Report

>>78460173
I'm spaniard. What's the problem amigo?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:58 UTC+1 No.78460454 Report

>>78459526
That does not look good for muli-crew dfm making it this year.

1.0 is supposedly less than 2 months away and even that might slip.

Kinda strange that racing is making it in so soon instead of focusing on the core content.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)12:59 UTC+1 No.78460518 Report

>>78460321
None, it was just amusing.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)13:03 UTC+1 No.78460769 Report

At least we will see something from th Carrack until end of this year

it's also funny that travis said something about full key customization not coming in 0.9 (R13) but "0.91" (R13.1)

apparently we will just get some more presets with 0.9

forums going to explode
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)13:16 UTC+1 No.78461602 Report

>>78460454
racing doesn't require a massive overhaul and rewrite of the physics systems, plus synching up player>ship>world. It's literally never successfully been done before, despite several attempts.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)13:18 UTC+1 No.78461685 Report

>>78460769
I still won't play it until they fix this. Not that I'm missing a whole lot.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)13:21 UTC+1 No.78461846 Report

>>78461602
the funny thing is that while you're points are true they pretty much fucked the "rewrite physics system" part with going with a in-atmosphere map (since we know stuff like air resistance will not be a factor)

Why they didn't do a space map instead is beyon d me
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)13:24 UTC+1 No.78462023 Report

>>78460769
The community in the forums are totally retarded. And the developers are foccussing in not essential things.

The best we can do with SC is forget it until a year
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)15:04 UTC+1 No.78468259 Report

>>78459526
I'm dreading the Freelancer becoming flyable because once it gets put ingame I'll lose the Hornet I have in the meantime and become useless in combat.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)15:47 UTC+1 No.78471365 Report

>>78471241

oh pooh
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)15:58 UTC+1 No.78472206 Report

>>78461846
Adding resistance and atmospheric modelling is a piece of piss compared to doing what
>>78461602
describes. I really don't know why anyone expected multi-crew out this year.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:01 UTC+1 No.78472484 Report

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCnpWQt1aw4

19:20 Arena commander theme

40:05 Murray cup theme
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:02 UTC+1 No.78472543 Report

>>78461846
It's 100 000 feet in the air or something. That's their excuse for no resistance.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:05 UTC+1 No.78472731 Report

i take it v.09 won't be released today?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:06 UTC+1 No.78472793 Report

>>78472731
It's not happening anon.

Check back next week, same time, same channel.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:06 UTC+1 No.78472839 Report

>>78472793
Maybe two weeks.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:10 UTC+1 No.78473118 Report

>>78472543
>>78472206

Maybe but I just find it funny that they would even give people ammunition wfor that kind of discussion. It's not like they wouldn't have been able to make a interesting race track in space, why even go there into atmosphere? People will take this as confirmation for atmospheric flight being worked on and start spinning storys up in their heads again
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:22 UTC+1 No.78474062 Report

>>78473118
Yeah, I guess I can only agree with that.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:24 UTC+1 No.78474157 Report

>>78472484

1:21:16 Star Citizen main theme
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:25 UTC+1 No.78474271 Report

>>78460454
1.0 is still at least 4.5 "two weeks" away
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:39 UTC+1 No.78475310 Report

I have a 770 and a 4770k

Will this game rape my machine?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:39 UTC+1 No.78475343 Report

>>78475310
you should be fine.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:40 UTC+1 No.78475384 Report

>>78475310
It will rape your life...
Run
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:41 UTC+1 No.78475471 Report

>>78475343
ok, thanks.
>>78475384
good.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:41 UTC+1 No.78475509 Report
File: the feel when.jpg-(125x89)
Any fellow/former avengers...
Any fellow/former avengers here? what ship did you sell your avenger for/what are you considering?

I think I might go for a hornet, but I don't want to lose my LTI, fuck this gay ship ;_;
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:43 UTC+1 No.78475632 Report

>>78475509
this isn't funny anymore
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:44 UTC+1 No.78475757 Report

>>78475632
Lighten up, Francis.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:45 UTC+1 No.78475816 Report

>>78475632
what?

I'm just asking what everyone traded for?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:46 UTC+1 No.78475886 Report
File: frac.jpg-(125x68)
...
>>78475757
>>78475816
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:46 UTC+1 No.78475918 Report

>>78475816
How blind do you have to be to not see the countless of "Avenger sucks" shitposts?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:47 UTC+1 No.78475942 Report

New pedro trainwreck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k53T_GxHs-0
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:48 UTC+1 No.78476031 Report
File: 1386249147744.jpg-(125x93)
>avenger owners don't...
>avenger owners don't have a super hornet, gladiator, m50, and phoenix
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:48 UTC+1 No.78476048 Report

>>78475942
that's what you get when you hire mexicans
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:51 UTC+1 No.78476309 Report

threadly reminder CDPR thinks so highly of pedro that they made him lead composer on all their games.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:51 UTC+1 No.78476310 Report
File: Redline2.jpg-(125x70)
>>78475942The music is...
>>78475942
The music is the part that I am the least hyped about. I find this really boring.
I'll just be blasting my own music in SC completely. But I guess that in SQ42 it will be integrated quite a bit, so I guess I'll have to suffer through that.

I'll be playing this specifically during races:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doEwWzMz99A
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:52 UTC+1 No.78476413 Report

>>78475942
I like it, actually. Has a kinda neat wipeout vibe to it.

>>78476310
I'll still be doing this, though.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:53 UTC+1 No.78476479 Report

>>78476310

>Original poster #300k

Don't ever become a sound engineer
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:54 UTC+1 No.78476558 Report

>>78476479
>>Original poster #300k
Who are you quoting? What's your point?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:54 UTC+1 No.78476565 Report

>>78476310
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtGolGWL6z8
AWWW YEAH.

Weapons are allowed during the Murray cup.

WE VEDLINE NOW
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:54 UTC+1 No.78476568 Report
File: 1401411598731.jpg-(125x121)
>>78475918but it...
>>78475918
but it does.

The avenger sucks. It's only slightly better then the arora ES
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:56 UTC+1 No.78476723 Report
File: Thumb up2.jpg-(125x113)
>>78476568Cool.
>>78476568
Cool.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:56 UTC+1 No.78476726 Report
File: 1398351879386.jpg-(125x112)
>>78476031>gladiator,...
>>78476031
>gladiator, m50,


>I don't have these

I do have the 350r which seems to be compareable to the m50, but we'll see, the Gladiator looks fucking sweet though and I'm sad I blew it off as a halfassed hornet/ret cross. oh well.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)16:57 UTC+1 No.78476763 Report

>>78476558

You you faggot.

>Post a song from a popular movie
>A song from a movie, which has a fixed start, middle and end
>Suitable for a in-game race that is dynamic
>Also repetitive and as attention grabbing as fuck compared to properly designed video game music

I'm sure that won't get repetitive as fuck, and I'm sure you won't get blown up and forced to retire within 30 seconds so you have a whole 5 minutes of song left that will only cause discord compared to the game.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:00 UTC+1 No.78477034 Report

>>78476763
>>Post a song from a popular movie
>>A song from a movie, which has a fixed start, middle and end
I don't see why this is relevant.
>>Suitable for a in-game race that is dynamic
Yeah. Online games don't have that dynamic and fast changing music anyway.
>>Also repetitive and as attention grabbing as fuck compared to properly designed video game music
Tastes. I like something more in your face when doing something fast paced.
>I'm sure that won't get repetitive as fuck, and I'm sure you won't get blown up and forced to retire within 30 seconds so you have a whole 5 minutes of song left that will only cause discord compared to the game.
There are these things called "media controls", that allow you to control music.

Seriously, your only point is that it's not dynamic? I really prefer constant good music over dynamic bad music. Talking about opinions obviously.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:00 UTC+1 No.78477037 Report

>>78476723
>post purchase remorse and rationalization
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:01 UTC+1 No.78477119 Report

>>78477034

>I don't see why this is relevant

Never fucking work for video games. Like ever.
I bet you never even touched a racing game in fact.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:01 UTC+1 No.78477149 Report

>>78476310
>>78476565
Don't forget about the best song, boys.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmqHs_6VSzQ
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:02 UTC+1 No.78477170 Report

>>78476726
>Comparable to the M50
IN YOUR DREAMS
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:02 UTC+1 No.78477190 Report

>>78477119
Are you going to post something that's not just a generic insult?

>I bet you never even touched a racing game in fact.
I'd take that bet.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:03 UTC+1 No.78477293 Report

>>78477190

http://youtu.be/1CIRDjCaMV4?t=3m32s
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:05 UTC+1 No.78477428 Report

>>78477293
Okay cool, guess an unexplained and cryptic video is different from an insult.

Enjoy sounding like a retard then.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:05 UTC+1 No.78477434 Report

>>78477170
;_;

a-at least I get the r-racer suit!
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:06 UTC+1 No.78477492 Report

>>78477434
Buzz Lightyear had a cool suit but he was still falling with style
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:06 UTC+1 No.78477507 Report

>>78477428

Enjoy your BAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAMBAM for 10 minutes straight then.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:07 UTC+1 No.78477561 Report

>>78477507
No clue what the fuck you're talking about, but sure, whatever.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:12 UTC+1 No.78477947 Report

>>78475942
But I liked this track a lot.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:14 UTC+1 No.78478076 Report

>listening to anything other than orchestrated chaos while playing SC
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:19 UTC+1 No.78478518 Report

>>78477428

>Hasn't played Trackmania

Ultra pleb detected, I bet your first racing game was Forza
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:20 UTC+1 No.78478631 Report

>>78478076
>Listening to anything other than this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DydIK14AvXI
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:20 UTC+1 No.78478638 Report

>>78475942
Tbh I think this one is awesome. Not really completely there where I'd likt it to be but god damn it's still really impressive. I like it a lot more than the more generic "Arena Commander theme"

I like to hear his take on the more ambient sounding parts of the game before I cast my vote

I like how Pedro is such a sound engineer geek, the synth he used in the racing track are quite cool
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:21 UTC+1 No.78478654 Report

>>78478518
My first racing game was Road Rash
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:22 UTC+1 No.78478748 Report

>>78478518
>>Hasn't played Trackmania
Why are you implying that? I didn't say that.

>Ultra pleb detected, I bet your first racing game was Forza
Never had an Xbox (360) mate.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:25 UTC+1 No.78479002 Report

>>78475942
Probably his best track. It's still kind of mediocre, though, and the climaxes as usual really just kind of pitter out and end up being underwhelming.
>>78478748
Ignore these guys. They think all video game music has to be boring and repetitive as fuck in order to fit with dynamic gameplay. They're the resident Pedro defense force.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:25 UTC+1 No.78479003 Report

>>78478638

I think Arena Commander theme is nice but not as good as SC's. Which is weird, it's like as if he's put next to nothing into a "game game"'s soundtrack compared to the rest of what we've heard, which is in SC proper (even if we're playing another video game equivalent of the real thing for now).

I was wondering if AC might sound like an equivalent to Battlefield's soundtrack but then I remembered what BF4 sounds like.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:27 UTC+1 No.78479174 Report

>>78479002

Meanwhile BAMBAMBAM for 10 minutes is the standard we're setting for quality music?

Please bitch nigga
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:28 UTC+1 No.78479223 Report

>>78476726
actually the 350R should be fairly comparable to the Avenger RS as a sort of endurance/inter-system rally racer
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:31 UTC+1 No.78479452 Report

>>78475509
>>78475632
>avenger getting btfo
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:32 UTC+1 No.78479558 Report

>>78479002
I agree with the climaxes to be sort of underwhelming which is also one of the things I'm not so keen on that one

>>78479003
BF4 main theme? You mean that distorted growling transformer tune with the really weak main synth work? No, I take the AC theme any time over that one since it's at least a little hommage to the old wing commander theme
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:38 UTC+1 No.78480119 Report

on the off chance to some poor impressionable anons are actually starting to get ideas about the penguin because all their cool friends are shitposting about it,
>size 5 gun
>size 5 engine
>size 3 powerplant(the gun can be ballistic anyway)
>32 freight units
>decent shield(size 3)
Nothings actually changed about it, friends.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:40 UTC+1 No.78480242 Report

>>78479174
No, not really. I didn't think that Redline's OST was that great (it got a little repetitive) but I did think it had the right idea of high octane in your face GOTTA GOOOOO FASSSSSST shit, and in context with the visuals it looked pretty good.

Anyway, I'll probably listen to my own stuff
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=345xNQMCUTA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LK3qEY5URRw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hplON6jl8hQ
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:40 UTC+1 No.78480306 Report

>>78480119
...yet

I wouldn't expect to keep that engine since they seem to be categorized by size. TR5 are the same the Constellation has and look at their dimensions
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:41 UTC+1 No.78480365 Report

>>78480242
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Duu1ZKtJDsw

Why not throw in some Mozart, for good measure, anon-kun?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:42 UTC+1 No.78480490 Report

>>78480242
... I don't really see the tracks you posted as a good racing background

or was this just some shameless "look at my music" plug?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:44 UTC+1 No.78480620 Report

>>78480306
Nah, its almost certainly going to keep the engine.
Recall, at one point CIG nerfed it to fuck with the engine and gun, then in the very next iteration on it it had it back. With less weight.
CIG likes it as a sanic BRRT ship, just like the rest of us. If anythings gonna change, they're gonna mutilate the cargo hold to make room for more engine volume.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:44 UTC+1 No.78480662 Report

>>78480119
oh course not.

I know if I didn't trade in my 300i for the avenger last year, while I could still LTI, it I'd be mad at its existence though, because the avenger pretty much the best single-man ship all-around


its just plain more efficient with space and better looking
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:45 UTC+1 No.78480687 Report

>>78480119
Freelancer DUR
>four size 5 guns (class 4)
>two size 5 engines
>size 5 powerplant
>148 freight units
>size 5 shields

The DUR is the hidden jouster that will undo Avenger meta.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:47 UTC+1 No.78480903 Report

>>78480620
I'm excited for variants of the avenger
>replace cargo bay with more engine/powerplant
>replace it with seats for 6 troops
>replace it with a hardpoint for a singe huge torpedo
>fill the cargo bay with computers and scanners for scouting/E-war

its such a great design compared to other ships
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:50 UTC+1 No.78481197 Report

>>78480903
If they nerfed the basic avenger and made the super engine one a variant, id really be perfectly happy with it. The cargo part of the avenger does make it appealing as a useful ship to fly, but the real reason I like it is because I just wanna go fast and tear shit up.
Less cargo would force it into a more dedicated bounty hunting role anyway, which it was advertised for.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:51 UTC+1 No.78481289 Report

>>78457272
>all these threads on the RSI forums about female character design
>A significant portion of the community seems to actually want armors and clothes to be unisex with little to no visual difference between males and females.
>mfw this group is the exact same group that would through a shitfit to rival the Ferguson riots if CR simply said "since there is no longer any visual difference between men and women except hairstyle we will simply be removing female characters from the game but keeping the hairs"
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:53 UTC+1 No.78481478 Report

>>78481197
a TR5 engine need not be that much better than TR3/4, as the speed cap is so low we hit it almost instantly.

remember the basic avenger has no missiles and bargin bin guns on it, its just the upgrade potential
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:55 UTC+1 No.78481635 Report

>>78481289

call their shit out as activism and watch them squeal. the mods will try to silence you, but if you keep pushing they will eventually cave, just like gaygate last year.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)17:57 UTC+1 No.78481820 Report

>>78481478
The upgrade potential is the appealing part. What it can be like upgraded.
Plus, anon, they're doubling the speed cap in the next patch, and different ships have different speed caps. The avenger will probably have a pretty fast one, though I wouldnt be suprised if its not quite able to compete in races with things like the m50.
Also, do we have information as to whether or not switching out for a larger engine changes the speed cap or just makes you accelerate better?
>>78480687
Weighs more than twice as much, its speed cap will probably fuck that dream.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:00 UTC+1 No.78482076 Report

>>78457272
Why do missiles have fins?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:00 UTC+1 No.78482108 Report

>>78481635
I dont have an account because I have A shit load of money from my new contracting job but am understandably weary of pledging yet. When we get an in depth look at the FPS stuff I might pledge 2 grand or so in auroras and do a giveaway here if it looks good but dont get your hopes up so I cannot post in them, only read them. Why don't you call them out and link me to the thread so I can see what happens?

>gaygate
explain?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:00 UTC+1 No.78482131 Report

>>78482076
Looks.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:01 UTC+1 No.78482152 Report

Missile meta
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:01 UTC+1 No.78482237 Report

>>78481820
>Weighs more than twice as much

It only weighs 1200kg more when you count the fact it has two engines.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:02 UTC+1 No.78482302 Report

>>78482076
Nice nostalgia bait you've got there, anon.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:02 UTC+1 No.78482308 Report

>>78482076
Because no one wants to look out the window and see a swarm of flying dildos
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:03 UTC+1 No.78482350 Report

>>78482108
>giving awae poorouras

no one would care
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:03 UTC+1 No.78482361 Report

>>78482076

Because in space does it matter?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:04 UTC+1 No.78482517 Report

>>78482350
fine avengers then?

If anything it could rustle that anon that keeps posting about how shit they are.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:06 UTC+1 No.78482657 Report

>>78482517
Thatd be good.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:06 UTC+1 No.78482684 Report

>>78482108
>pledge 2 grand or so in auroras and do a giveaway here
>giveaway auroras

mfw

>>78482108
>call them out

many of us already have

>>78482108
>explain?

https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/75002/cig-ban-all-real-life-politics-from-the-forums

tl;dr somebody called them out, they all attacked the guy, and the mods couldn't close the thread so they hid it. most discussion of faggot shit ceased by the year's end, minus the official faggot thread in OT section.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:07 UTC+1 No.78482739 Report

So will they be able to implement seamless interaction between interior and exterior? I'm having my doubts. It's never been done before.
Network lag kills it
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:07 UTC+1 No.78482740 Report

>>78482517
now that would be hilarious
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:07 UTC+1 No.78482792 Report

>>78482108
>contractor
WAIT A SECOND IVE HEARD ALL THIS BEFORE
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:08 UTC+1 No.78482898 Report

>>78482308
Why do dildos have fins then?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:09 UTC+1 No.78482929 Report

>>78482739
What do you mean by that? The fundemental ability of multi crew ships to function properly and not act fucktarded in multiplayer, or just shit like eva and boarding?
If the latter, its not too big a deal if its shaky, as long as it lets players get the job done without the flaws being too jarring.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:09 UTC+1 No.78482961 Report

>>78482898
To distinguish them from their dildo brethren
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:11 UTC+1 No.78483102 Report

>>78482929
Everything
Damage being visible from the inside of the ship.
Being able to walk around while the ship you're in is acceleration a lot.
Physics interaction
Basically the whole deal.
It's easy locally but when you introduce latency it gets messy really fast.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:13 UTC+1 No.78483273 Report

>>78482684
>https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/75002/cig-ban-all-real-life-politics-from-the-forums
I don't see how he's wrong.
He's simply asking for the discussions to stay game-related. And off-topic should not tie in to the game.
He got banned?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:13 UTC+1 No.78483307 Report

>>78483102

Not really. Acceleration won't affect anyone inside a ship because they'll get registered on a different physics grid where you're relative to points of the ship not space. Which means you can drop accurate simulation of where you are in space and effectively still only have one set of physics calculations to worry about.

Damage to specific parts of the ship is just standard hitbox technology since the 90s.

That pretty much covers everything.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:14 UTC+1 No.78483428 Report

>>78482929
>>What do you mean by that?
I'm guessing he means technically, it's a pretty big challenge and to make it work without any sort of lag or clipping into the ship whilst its moving will probably be difficult.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:15 UTC+1 No.78483459 Report

>>78483273
he isn't wrong, its the faggots that feel persecuted because no one wants to see them and their gay agenda everywhere.

as you scroll down you see the butthurt fags and their inability to have any form of reading comprehension.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:16 UTC+1 No.78483552 Report

>>78483307
But how would the person inside the ship actually follow the ship?
You can't predict movement when it's not on rails and being controlled by a player.
You're making it sound simpler then it is.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:18 UTC+1 No.78483749 Report

>>78480365
Mozart is boring.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETNoPqYAIPI
Dvorak is the music for men of passion
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:19 UTC+1 No.78483826 Report

>>78483552

As it is there's zero fucking reason to jump inside a ship. Until that changes you can have an even simpler level of physics than the fucking hanger.

That said I don't understand what you're getting confused by. The computer can do ANYTHING when it comes to visually representing objects, it's just figuring out with other machines what's going to happen next in a highly dynamic environment. But if you assume that the ship moving around erratically is purely a visual element, the computer can still easily crunch through basics such as "In relation to center of ship, player moved 3 feet forward orientation 120 degrees.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:20 UTC+1 No.78483959 Report

>>78483749
I think you mean men with passion for other men.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:22 UTC+1 No.78484109 Report

>>78483959
>Not having intense brotherly love for men of merit
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:22 UTC+1 No.78484159 Report

>>78483749
Damn, this is nice. I dont usually listen to old classical.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:23 UTC+1 No.78484221 Report

>>78483749

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yro42zd5XtM
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:24 UTC+1 No.78484289 Report

>>78483826
>the computer can still easily crunch through basics such as "In relation to center of ship, player moved 3 feet forward orientation 120 degrees.
Yea and now introduce latency to that.
I have a latency of 30 ms. That has to go to a server and the server has to talk to other people who probably have higher then 50+ ms. that's close to 100 ms just for 1 update.
That's a lot in physics world.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:26 UTC+1 No.78484469 Report

>>78480306
>since they seem to be categorized by size.
No they don't.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:27 UTC+1 No.78484610 Report

>>78484289

30ms is roughly 2 frames.
You can go probably 6 frames before you send a packet of relative orientation/position data only extremely marginally increasing the size of the packet, with which the server can calculate the discrepancy and advise the client to correct this, or in extreme cases enforce this.

Boom, latency is now solved with a margin of error to within 10 frames. Assuming clients run 45 frames at least a second, nobody will actually notice any discrepancy outside of exceptional error.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:30 UTC+1 No.78484890 Report

>>78484610
I don't know if you're aware but the biggest AAA games have this issue where you can't get hit if you keep tapping left and right. You can't compensate a dynamic enviroment accurately. And when this missing information has to keep you inside a ship it gets weird
But maybe they''l make the players inside the ship unaware from the outside physics. Fuck if I know.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:31 UTC+1 No.78484962 Report

>>78484610

Replace "Frames" with "Hertz" except the last sentence.
1 Hz = 16ms, which explains why the average minimum ping is 32ms = it's 60FPS/one packet of data send and returned in one round trip per frame
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:31 UTC+1 No.78484995 Report

>>78484890
Huntokar did say they were on a seperate physics grid because of the artificial gravity.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:34 UTC+1 No.78485234 Report

>>78484962
>Replace "Frames" with "Hertz" except the last sentence.
>1 Hz = 16ms
Dude. 1 Hz means once a second.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:36 UTC+1 No.78485382 Report

>>78484890
I don't know if you're aware but the biggest AAA games have bullshit issues like that because it would take some effort to solve them but they don't need to because retarded FPS fans will suck the big publishers' cocks with every release no matter how shitty the games get.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:36 UTC+1 No.78485387 Report

>>78484890

Pretty much entirely what you're worrying about is entirely netcode, not physics. The hit detection is usually spot on using common techniques, it's shitty prediction netcode throwing those math way out of whack that's the problem.

Here's a simple solution:
Don't make a counter strike clone on low tick rate that pushes hitboxes a full fucking metre ahead of where the model actually is based on vector, there's a L4D video around somewhere demonstrating how shitty source is like that.

Alternatively don't design a game entirely around client side hit detection, hitscan and one-shot kills.

>>78485234

60 Hz = 16ms, fuck.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:36 UTC+1 No.78485425 Report

>>78484159
Czech composers are really great. But yeah. I prefer stuff like this, Mahler, Chopin, Schubert etc. Mozart is nice and all, and I used to love him as a kid, but his music just started to sound too lightweight and shallow after awhile.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:38 UTC+1 No.78485563 Report

>>78485425
Oh look, it's "Pedro isn't as good as the best composers who ever lived in human history"-fag
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:41 UTC+1 No.78485836 Report

>>78485563
Huh? I didn't even mention Pedro. There is more than one person who likes those composers, dipshit.
>"Pedro isn't as good as the best composers who ever lived in human history"
Also fuck if I know if they were the best that lived in human history. Some of the best for their era, sure, but plenty of contemporary composers and ones that preceded the 1800's could easily lay claim to that.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:42 UTC+1 No.78485909 Report

/mu/ faggots need to leave
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:48 UTC+1 No.78486475 Report

>>78485425
I've never listened to classical much, not quite acclimated to its style. The extent of my exposure to actually listening to albums of the stuff is some turkish/ottoman classical I downloaded recently, and some lite-classical that was on British radio in the 20th century.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0AxgHAgIfQ
And one album of 'modern classical' im starting to doubt my appreciation of more and more each time I open it up.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:49 UTC+1 No.78486614 Report

>>78485387
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brJmVOLgz9Q

> that pushes hitboxes a full fucking metre ahead of where the model actually is

Hah, holy fuck you weren't kidding. Though client-side hitboxes are worse, I don't really know what you could do to fix this to be super accurate.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:57 UTC+1 No.78487415 Report

>>78486475
British naval music is pretty gud
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHNfvJc99YY
Really makes me want to ruthlessly commit genocide and enslave the survivors, oddly enough.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)18:58 UTC+1 No.78487548 Report

>>78487415
God save the queen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZfYtCLA23s
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:10 UTC+1 No.78488652 Report

fucking /mu/
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:11 UTC+1 No.78488760 Report

I don't know if you can render to texture in CE, but making a copy of each ship in a hidden room and then projecting the world from the flown ship's perspective around it, then just sync the damage&repairing between the two. If the guy inside it thrown out, teleport him out of hidden room
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:12 UTC+1 No.78488825 Report

>>78488652
better than /mlp/

amirite
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:19 UTC+1 No.78489481 Report

>>78488760
Don't try to explain how they could do it. The issue is that CIG is doing, in cryengine, so it has to fail. On the other hand the same people are saying over in /erg/ it's not a problem for braben to do it in the all ready announced addon for E:D because they are using the highly advanced engine of Fucking zoo tycoon.

Just post the gamescom presentation showing multicrew all ready kind of working and you ignore it.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:22 UTC+1 No.78489749 Report

>>78482684
>https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/75002/cig-ban-all-real-life-politics-from-the-forums

We need more people like this on the forums.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:22 UTC+1 No.78489756 Report

>>78489481
Come now anon, we werent delving into that brand of shitposting.
Then again, I cant tell the difference between actual /v/ retardation and baiting shitposts anymore. Fucking poes law.
Regardless, noone was bitching over that, just having a decent discussion of the problems and possible solutions to them of multi crew ships in multiplayer.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:25 UTC+1 No.78490016 Report

>>78489481

>/erg/
>owtheedge for no reason
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:30 UTC+1 No.78490563 Report

>PAX Prime
>DragonCon
>PAX Aus

We getting another CitizenCon this year? Could've sworn they said they wanted it to be yearly. Got some decent concept art from last years
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:32 UTC+1 No.78490771 Report

>>78490563
2 sy fy 4 me

Unless this is supposed to be the metro on a hazardous planet i don't see the reason to make it look like a space bus.

I know i'm picky...
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:33 UTC+1 No.78490951 Report

>>78490771
>a hazardous planet
Terra is the most high tech and safe world in the UEE
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:34 UTC+1 No.78490986 Report

>>78490771
Like they don't already.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:35 UTC+1 No.78491105 Report

Koonglets having a fight with each other?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:35 UTC+1 No.78491181 Report

>>78490563
speaking of PAX arent they supposed to reveal their FPS stuff there?

When is that like october or something?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:35 UTC+1 No.78491204 Report

>>78490563
>Could've sworn they said they wanted it to be yearly.
That's what they said at the start. But at that point it was supposed to be something totally different then what they're doing now, way bigger and shit. Now they're just renting one video stage for a couple of people.

But yeah, there's going to be a CitizenCon I think, quite sure I've heard that being mentioned somewhere.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:37 UTC+1 No.78491339 Report

>>78490986
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:37 UTC+1 No.78491404 Report

>>78490016
Phone autocorrect thinks /erg/ is more of a word than /edg/ what can I do
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:39 UTC+1 No.78491575 Report

>>78486614
Well you'll never get spot on accuracy but that's not the issue.
There could be issues with teleporting entities and what not.
I just hope they can figure it out.
It's unprecedented.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:39 UTC+1 No.78491621 Report

>>78490986
>>78491339
New Pokemon Design
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:39 UTC+1 No.78491626 Report

>>78490986
Dont fool yourself. It's nothing but a pretty paint job. >>78490563 could be a fucking space bridge.

>>78490951
Yes. My point exactly. It should look more like >>78490986 or pic related.

thoughts?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:40 UTC+1 No.78491653 Report

>>78491181
October 31st to the 2nd November
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:40 UTC+1 No.78491674 Report

>>78491105

Probably.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:41 UTC+1 No.78491779 Report

>>78489481
multicrew working in gamescon was most likely over LAN, and working over LAN is far easier than over internet
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:42 UTC+1 No.78491952 Report

>>78491626
That your cognitive dissonance is strong

You're complaining about fucking train design, this is a sign you should be doing something else with your time
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:46 UTC+1 No.78492284 Report

>>78491674

i herd regulas was ded
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:47 UTC+1 No.78492384 Report

>>78491674
I thought ved was furry
oh well
It's probably a good thing I don't keep myself up to date with that crap
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:48 UTC+1 No.78492442 Report

>>78491653
thanks bro.

its in ausfailia right?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:48 UTC+1 No.78492449 Report

>>78491952
It's more like the aesthetics for the game are just super shitty and not consistent at all. The space train really does look like crap and doesn't mesh well. I'm less concerned about the train itself, though, and more concerned about their inability to have good art direction for the game.

It also tickles my autism when people dickride the game for being so "immersive" but everything about it is so halfassed with no attention to detail.

It's like when autists dickride Skyrim for being immersive.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:48 UTC+1 No.78492452 Report

>>78491952
>You're complaining about fucking train design
I was thinking the exact same thing.

But I'm enjoying a Paulaner Hefe-Weizbier and listening to Wolfmother. I'm having a great time!
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:49 UTC+1 No.78492602 Report

>>78492384
>I thought ved was furry

It is, and I'd post images, but then they would scream for the janitor.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:49 UTC+1 No.78492609 Report

>>78492442
Hence the name

It's down in Melbourne
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:49 UTC+1 No.78492632 Report

>>78492449
Skyrim can get pretty fucking immersive with about 135 mods running though. It also made it pretty fun
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:50 UTC+1 No.78492670 Report

>>78492284
>Le epik redderik TROLL meemee xD
Good.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:50 UTC+1 No.78492726 Report

>there are people posting is this thread, at this very moment, who will be intentionally using ANY other ship besides the freelancer once the PU goes live.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:51 UTC+1 No.78492796 Report

>>78492670
>tumblr
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:53 UTC+1 No.78492916 Report

>>78492796
tumblr is a much more relevant site than 4chan will ever be, you know.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:53 UTC+1 No.78492951 Report

>>78492726
Freelancer pilots are cute. They're like the innocent children wandering about. Like dogs among wolves.

Yes, that is hashtag_shots_fucking_fired right there motherfucker.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:53 UTC+1 No.78492998 Report

>>78492609
well shit. Is it open to the public?

Might have to go if I can get vacation for it.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:55 UTC+1 No.78493221 Report

>>78492796
You realize its just a blog platform right.
You realize that there are lots of tumblr blogs that are nothing but some particular kind of art or images with a certain theme, and no social justice crap or interaction with the cesspool community of the site, right.
http://art-of-swords.tumblr.com/
case in point
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:55 UTC+1 No.78493239 Report

>>78492951
wannabe pirate hornet pilot detected.

enjoy getting shot to shit by my player crewed freelancer mis as I continue to fly in the same direction as if you arent even shooting at me.

I just want anvil viral marketing to leave.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:56 UTC+1 No.78493297 Report

>>78492998
Damn nigga here's the site go find out
http://aus.paxsite.com/
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:56 UTC+1 No.78493324 Report

>>78492916
>you know

Yes, xir, I know.

>>78493221
>>>/out/
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:59 UTC+1 No.78493606 Report

>>78493324
>You realize its just a blog platform right.
>You realize that there are lots of tumblr blogs that are nothing but some particular kind of art or images with a certain theme, and no social justice crap or interaction with the cesspool community of the site, right.
>http://art-of-swords.tumblr.com/
>case in point
>just a blog platform
>lots of tumblr blogs that are nothing but some particular kind of art or images with a certain theme, and no social justice crap or interaction with the cesspool community of the site
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)19:59 UTC+1 No.78493663 Report

>>78493239
Actually i take back what i said. I respect Freelancer owners and their interests.

And i'm not a pirate.

freelancers are still qt, tho
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:01 UTC+1 No.78493890 Report

>>78493663
>tfw Cutlass will never be respected
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:03 UTC+1 No.78494010 Report

>>78493663
I might have to go pirate now just so I can grief you.

List of reasonable ships to use in the PU, all else is trash.

>Freelancer MIS
>Freelancer Merc
>Freelancer MAX
>Caterpillar
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:03 UTC+1 No.78494015 Report

>>78493890
I'll start respecting Cutlass owners when they start using their ships for search and rescue, as stated by Drake.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:03 UTC+1 No.78494054 Report

>>78493890
More like you'll never be respected.

As long as you crave approval from /scg/.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:05 UTC+1 No.78494290 Report

>>78494054
>crave approval from /scg/
>people actually do this
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:05 UTC+1 No.78494361 Report

>>78494010
>I might have to go pirate now just so I can grief you.
Just for calling Freelancers qt?

>Aquilas not reasonable for spase adventure with friends in the persistento universo
Its like you're generalizing or something.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:06 UTC+1 No.78494449 Report

>>78493221
>You realize its just a blog platform right.
A blog platform centered around images.

Which it then mangles to a thumbnail of 500pix wide (which users download way too much), or images of 1200pix wide. Or even better, the gifs that can't be more than 1MiB, and only thumbnail resolution.
It's shit.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:08 UTC+1 No.78494719 Report

>>78494449
>giving a shit
i'm pretty sure the poster of the image got it from guugle.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:10 UTC+1 No.78494947 Report

So why is /scg/ bearable all of a sudden?
Despite all the passive aggressiveness it's quite comfy now
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:12 UTC+1 No.78495061 Report

>>78494947
Mods took notice.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:12 UTC+1 No.78495091 Report

>>78494947

Ved left.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:12 UTC+1 No.78495135 Report

>>78494947
the comfy rule has propagated across all pertinent realms
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:13 UTC+1 No.78495169 Report

>>78494719
>>giving a shit
I do not see the problem with caring about quality.

>i'm pretty sure the poster of the image got it from guugle.
That doesn't make it better.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:14 UTC+1 No.78495360 Report

>>78495091

You spoke too son.

>>78495061
>crying to mods

go back to /co/
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:15 UTC+1 No.78495454 Report

who \origin\ master race here?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:16 UTC+1 No.78495552 Report

>>78495454
fegget
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:16 UTC+1 No.78495652 Report

>>78495454
>300cry
>gud
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:19 UTC+1 No.78495947 Report

>>78494947
its what /scg/ does. Fluctuates between a few days of HORRIBLE HORRIBLE SHITPOSTING and periods of calm.
It seems to be worse when groups are around, like kong. Not to be paranoid or pin everything on them, they just genuinely seem to enjoy fucking with the thread. Dunno if ved even visits anymore. And when anyone from /v/ drops in.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:20 UTC+1 No.78496069 Report

>>78495454
origin is qt too
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:20 UTC+1 No.78496084 Report

>>78495947
>It seems to be worse when groups are around, like kong

You know that 90% of the time the groups aren't here, right?

Its just anons shitposting because its guaranteed_replies.txt
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:22 UTC+1 No.78496276 Report

>>78496084
Pretty contradictory to all evidence, anon. They're probably here more than 10% of the time. And as I said, im not being paranoid and saying they're the all present jew machinating every shit dive /scg/ takes. But it gets worse when they are here. They like to shitpost and fuck with the locals, and the locals like to shitpost more and more when they're around.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:22 UTC+1 No.78496323 Report

>>78495947
>>78495135
>>78495091
>>78495061
>>78494947
Its Friday night mutha fuckas. That means good mood, alcohol, music, popcorn are on the schedule. [/spoiler]And the fact that i'm posting way too much right now...[/spoiler]
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:23 UTC+1 No.78496435 Report

>>78496276
>Pretty contradictory to all evidence

What evidence

its an anonymous board, and people hardly ever trip.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:24 UTC+1 No.78496534 Report

star citizens shouled hav emusic like THIS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sC0cvwnG0Ik
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:25 UTC+1 No.78496673 Report

>>78496534
Oh look, it's "Pedro isn't one of the best composers in human history"-fag
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:26 UTC+1 No.78496695 Report

>>78495454
near future m50 pilot here

gotta, wanna, have to go fast
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:26 UTC+1 No.78496786 Report

>>78496276
>They're probably here more than 10% of the time
Technically almost 100% of the time since there are a lot of people just in the ved or kong, just not actively promoting that retarded shit.
Just saiyan
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:27 UTC+1 No.78496891 Report

>>78496673
What
I didnt even fucking mention pedro you cock bandit
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:28 UTC+1 No.78496918 Report

>>78492284
>i herd regulas was ded

where all the kongoons to clarify?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:29 UTC+1 No.78497015 Report

>>78495360
>waaah i dont like those posts mod delete them

midaswell be on RSI
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:32 UTC+1 No.78497368 Report

>the planet map has the same flight model as space
>can still see atmospheric perspective being show in the video
>so they are in the atmosphere

>we don't need separate atmosphere flight models for where we are going

>still cant alpha test without paying for all the content separately
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:33 UTC+1 No.78497526 Report

>>78497368
Sounds like you're just entitled.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:35 UTC+1 No.78497647 Report

>>78497368
>>can still see atmospheric perspective being show in the video
That would be a bug/mistake then, since they're 100 000 feet in the air.

>>still cant alpha test without paying for all the content separately
But you can, at least all the relevant things. There's no need to have more than thousands of people testing individual ships.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:35 UTC+1 No.78497667 Report

>>78495552
>Hornet only has two of its six/eight guns
>isn't even firing them
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:35 UTC+1 No.78497716 Report

>>78497526
>>78497368
>demanding they waste their time on fully detailed atmospheric flight isn't autism if it means we get to call CIG and the game shit
No, anon, its autism.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:35 UTC+1 No.78497740 Report

>>78492632

I guess our only hope for SC being good is mod then

SO LONG PERSISTENT UNIVERSE!
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:36 UTC+1 No.78497783 Report

we still posting shitty racing music?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBIE7ViCi2s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lspjLG9nHXk
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:36 UTC+1 No.78497804 Report

>>78497667
That's how bad the 300i is.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:36 UTC+1 No.78497828 Report

>>78497368
Did you pledge late or something?

Some of us have been down for this shit over a year now. And a great deal have more or less full faith in the developers. Chris won't even accept outside criticism on the matter as it is his game, and he already has every cent needed to finish it.

Pretty sure people just want to fly around spaceships with others, dude.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:38 UTC+1 No.78497953 Report

>>78497368
>Thinking atmospheric flight's biggest hurdle is the flight model
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:38 UTC+1 No.78497976 Report

>>78497783
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baUY9LFlYh0 is the only valid option.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:38 UTC+1 No.78498005 Report

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ey1waUKCS2k
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:39 UTC+1 No.78498103 Report

>>78497828
You can already do this in other games right now.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:39 UTC+1 No.78498106 Report

>>78495552
>>78497667
do you actually get a faceful of glass when you eject from that plebrocket?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:40 UTC+1 No.78498245 Report

>>78495454
M50 is cool
300-series is utter shit except for 350R, the 890jump wasn't impressive either
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:41 UTC+1 No.78498269 Report

>>78497976
that show was terrible but I like this song
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:41 UTC+1 No.78498307 Report

>>78497828
I'm a golden ticket holder and I have nothing that approaches full faith in CIG, considering for every task, they drop the ball hard.
They miss deadlines by months frequently.
They can't even get the basics like keybinds in (travis confirmed for not in 0.9)
They promised no pay 2 win, but the alpha phase is exactly that when it could be easily fixed
They make claims of immershun and then shoehorn in-game advertisements, with a different acronym because that totally fixes it.
They constantly go back on their word.

Nah. I am incredibly underwhelmed by CIG's level of professionalism.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:42 UTC+1 No.78498405 Report

>>78497783
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo_gJwXxshQ
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:42 UTC+1 No.78498426 Report

>>78498106
Hasn't got a proper eject animation yet, I don't think
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:42 UTC+1 No.78498439 Report

>>78498307
>They can't even get the basics like keybinds in (travis confirmed for not in 0.9)
they already confirmed it would be in, pleb.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:42 UTC+1 No.78498481 Report

>>78497828
>Chris won't even accept outside criticism on the matter as it is his game, and he already has every cent needed to finish it.
So he's like George Lucas. Brilliant.

Also, if he has every cent he needs, why has he recently said that 50 mil isn't enough?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:43 UTC+1 No.78498583 Report

>>78498481
Where did he say that?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:44 UTC+1 No.78498639 Report

>>78498439
Oh really? What's this, then?
https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/comment/3245279/#Comment_3245279

>2. I am not saying that this is going to be delayed until 1.0 though I understand how you may have gotten that from what was said on reverse the verse. To clarify the fully rebindable keys through the GUI should be coming in release 13.1 or 13.2 (V0.91 or V0.92). The first step in this process is what you will have upon the release of V0.9 which is having multiple presets for most popular control peripherals. The work to support this had to be done on the path towards fully rebindable keys so we've decided to give our progress to the community even though we aren't fully done with the full implementation.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:45 UTC+1 No.78498704 Report

>>78498405
>tfw spamming this unironically while playing scout on the partyvan server
VoIP when, I want to share /scg/'s tunes with the unwilling community
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:46 UTC+1 No.78498920 Report

>>78498639
just for reference everyone, this is the best way to get a source out of /scg/'s shitters. lord knows they'll just deflect and tell you to google it if you ask nicely.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:47 UTC+1 No.78499009 Report

>>78498639
Ho-le fuck, CIG.

Keybinds are basic shit. You're using an existing engine that natively supports that. It would take less than a day.

Get your shit together.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:48 UTC+1 No.78499096 Report

>>78498583
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14055-Letter-From-The-Chairman


>To sustain this level of development, we need to keep bringing in additional funds. Star Citizen is still much less than the other published backed AAA games that have similar levels of ambition (some would even say a little less :-) ) like GTA V, Watch Dogs or Destiny.
>>78498920
I typically link the source if I have it handy when people ask, anon.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:52 UTC+1 No.78499491 Report

>>78499009
it would take less than a day for fps motion. remember they have to configure this shit via the IFCS; they aren't just rebinding "A moves character left" they're rebinding "A fires specific top left thrusters and an equal amount of bottom right thrusters, in a specific direction at a specific burn level, in an configuration that maintains forward vector, which is different for each ship."
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:52 UTC+1 No.78499531 Report

>>78499009
It's amazing, isn't it? We've been asking for keybinds since the fucking Hangar module dropped.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:53 UTC+1 No.78499638 Report

>>78499491
No they're not. They don't have to touch the IFCS at all.

Binding roll to Joystick X axis merely changes what button triggers the event, not the even itself.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:54 UTC+1 No.78499691 Report

>>78499491
Lol, no, it's not that complicated. You can edit XML's right now and it works fine if you change roll from A,D to Q,E. There is no dickfuckery with the IFCS. Please stop spreading misinformation.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:54 UTC+1 No.78499752 Report

>>78499531
If that actually implied as much incompetence as you're implying, theyd not have been able to do anything like the dogfighting module we've got. Its more of a matter of saying fuck it to important functionality and player demands in favor of just going along with development as they care to go about it.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:55 UTC+1 No.78499831 Report

>>78499491
If they designed it not like a retard, all they had to do was bind "left" to whatever instead of just A.
And I seriously doubt CIG is that retarded. You don't get flight if you're that retarded.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:55 UTC+1 No.78499835 Report

.9 when?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:55 UTC+1 No.78499839 Report

>>78499638
I'm pretty sure they are being forced to muck about with the IFCS and flight model outright if it is actually going to be further delayed. Not many other explanations would be reasonable.

All of this said, I can just rebind my HOTAS functions in its software. Whether or not this is supported in-game is of little consequence.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:56 UTC+1 No.78499904 Report

>>78497368
You'd need to simulate drag caused by air. It's harder then it looks.
Space really is easy.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:56 UTC+1 No.78499927 Report

>>78499752
> theyd not have been able to do anything like the dogfighting module we've got.

It was 6 months late.

>>78499839
Yeah, nah. You can change them as it is with XML changes that don't change the IFCS. It would be simple as shit.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:57 UTC+1 No.78500031 Report

>>78499835
Next week
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:57 UTC+1 No.78500043 Report

>>78499904
>You'd need to simulate drag caused by air. It's harder then it looks.
Actually, given that this is Cryengine, this would be easier. They're actually disabling drag instead of not adding it.
All they would have to do is re-enable it.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:58 UTC+1 No.78500076 Report

>>78499839
You just admitted that you can change it yourself. Anon, do you have to fuck around with the IFCS and flight model for simple KEY REBINDS? Do you have ANY IDEA how stupid you're sounding right now? Like no offense, but that is dumb. There are plenty of other reasons that they won't fucking do keybinds that make more sense than what you're saying.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:59 UTC+1 No.78500261 Report

>>78499927
>It was 6 months late.
Oh boy, this dumb little soundbyte.
Not really. The first promise they made for when to release it was insane and stupid. It came a bit later than it should have been able to, but not by that much.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)20:59 UTC+1 No.78500263 Report

>>78499491
HHUUURRR
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:00 UTC+1 No.78500332 Report

>>78500043
But can Cryengine vary drag amount based on height? This is required for seamless space->atmosphere and vice versa
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:00 UTC+1 No.78500394 Report

>>78500261
>The first promise they made for when to release it was insane and stupid.

Doesn't make it any less late.

Basically what you're saying is they weren't incompetent, but they were insane and stupid.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:01 UTC+1 No.78500485 Report

>>78498307
>>They promised no pay 2 win, but the alpha phase is exactly that when it could be easily fixed
They promised no P2W when the game launches faggot
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:01 UTC+1 No.78500545 Report

>>78500332
>seamless space->atmosphere and vice versa
never going to happen.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:01 UTC+1 No.78500546 Report

>>78500332
>height
Not exactly but you get my point.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:01 UTC+1 No.78500550 Report

>>78500332
Don't know, but that wasn't the point. It was only for a specific map, not seamless transition. I wouldn't expect that any time soon.

I'm pretty sure it was a value though, and if that's the case it shouldn't be difficult to tie that to height.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:02 UTC+1 No.78500615 Report

>>78500332
Not only is seamless space to atmosphere flight extremely unlikely, its not at all promised even for final release.

Nor would that be hard at all. The difficulty would come from other places.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:03 UTC+1 No.78500725 Report

>>78500545
Confirmed?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:04 UTC+1 No.78500823 Report

>>78500725
Its extremely unfeasible, and if it was going to happen it would be harped on about constantly because of how difficult it would be to implement.

Don't be stupid.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:05 UTC+1 No.78500940 Report

>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:05 UTC+1 No.78501003 Report

>>78500485
And never, ever mentioned or implied that alpha/beta would be pay 2 win. What fucking game in the history of ever has made their alpha p2w but not their released game?

A p2w alpha is not fucking okay, especially when we had no reason to think that it would ever be like that. Deliberately misleading your customers and using word lawyering to get around that.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:05 UTC+1 No.78501014 Report

>>78500940
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:05 UTC+1 No.78501018 Report

>>78500394
Nice evasion faggot. Good to see you care more about feeding your stupid ideas than reason.
It damn well does change the implications and meaning of how late it was.
Not that it isnt retarded to think of it as being that late. As if that first date was meaningful in the first place.
Yeah, though, the actual time they took to develop the dogfighting module was perfectly reasonable and comptetent, especially when you account for parallel development.
>SIX MONTHS LATE THOUGH!!!!
doesnt mean jack shit when it was six months late from a magic fairy deadline that nobody was ever going to meet.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:07 UTC+1 No.78501178 Report

>>78501003
>winning anything in alpha and beta

are you retarded m8?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:07 UTC+1 No.78501248 Report

Its not really all that pay to win though.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:08 UTC+1 No.78501298 Report

>>78501018
Your cognitive dissonance is astounding
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:09 UTC+1 No.78501368 Report

>>78500394
>>78500261
>>78499927
>a pre-alpha test build was "late".
Who the assfuck cares. I keep hearing left and right that games are being rushed and fans being mad about games being released unfinished and unpolished with rushed content and what not. The DFM was a pre-motherfucking-pre-alpha test build for the basic flight mechanics. How on earth could anyone be mad for that being delayed?

Are you going to die within the next 2 years?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:09 UTC+1 No.78501389 Report

>>78501178
>Being at the top of the scoreboard
>Winning all your matches
>Fucking leaderboards
>Not being considered winning because "It's an alpha!"

It has a load of winstates. All the content in the game is locked behind massive paywalls right now. If they let us unlock things ingame instead of paying hundreds of dollars, then it wouldn't be p2w and they wouldn't have lied.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:10 UTC+1 No.78501554 Report

>>78501368
Dude, don't hate. Some of the the anons here might be so fat and helpless, they could die of coronary heart failure at any moment.

Surely their frustration is warranted.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:10 UTC+1 No.78501560 Report

>>78501298
Cry moar retard. Setting shitty, misleading deadlines isnt the same thing as being incompetent at actual development.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:11 UTC+1 No.78501597 Report

>>78492284

who?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:11 UTC+1 No.78501631 Report

>>78501560
Holy fuck dude, control your cognitive dissonance
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:11 UTC+1 No.78501640 Report

>>78501389
i got a 4chan pass and you're a faggot

is 4chan p2w?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:12 UTC+1 No.78501712 Report

>>78492602
The thing about Kong's furries is that they hate themselves so much, they whitewash everything and blame it on Ved, because deep down they know they're far worse.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:12 UTC+1 No.78501750 Report

>>78501389
I think you misunderstand. The game is not released yet. What we have now is an alpha test build. Its for testing purposes. If you're playing to win now, that means you have a warped understanding of the current state of the "game".

The game will release in 2 years++. You can hold on to your p2w arguments until then. If people want to spend more money to "win" over other alpha testers that's their choice.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:12 UTC+1 No.78501771 Report

>tfw Hornet and 300i cash shop gun players are able to land hits way outside my Auroras stock weapon range

>tfw even I engage a 300i/Hornet from the rear they turn around and in a direct fire exchange while downstrafing I still lose

how 2 get gud
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:13 UTC+1 No.78501875 Report

>>78501771
not fly a pooroura
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:13 UTC+1 No.78501882 Report

>>78501750
They should unlock every ship for everyone man
This is one part I'm a bit mad about.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:14 UTC+1 No.78501957 Report

>>78501368
This is /v/ and /scg/. They'll find any fucking reason to bitch about things.
>>78501389
>All the content in the game is locked behind massive paywalls right now.
Thats not the same thing as pay to win. Pay to win doesnt just mean anything I dont like involving microtransactions. Locking power behind pay walls is pay to win, so arguments can be made about the hornet in that regard, but its hard to apply to the guns.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:15 UTC+1 No.78502084 Report

>>78501750
An alpha with all content locked behind massive paywalls is bullshit, anon. Fuck off with your excuses. The entire content of the alpha should be available to all backers, because that's the standard, that's what's fair, and they NEVER, EVER said that it would be a pay2"win" alpha, and instead gave us various statements that directly implied that it WASN'T.

For fucks sake. Most people won't even be ABLE to use the new racing mode because they will be stuck in fucking auroras.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:16 UTC+1 No.78502126 Report

>>78501631
>>78501298
>Resorts to slinging buzzwords when he has no argument
>Refusing to allow his irrational, demented viewpoints to be changed, preferring to resort to internet shit flinging
10/10 poster.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:16 UTC+1 No.78502129 Report

>>78501882
>I'm a bit mad about.

Thats a bit sad
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:16 UTC+1 No.78502161 Report

>>78501712
Kong was founded by furries far worse than ved's
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:16 UTC+1 No.78502197 Report

>>78501875
:(
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:17 UTC+1 No.78502271 Report

>>78501957
>Hard to apply to the guns
What is Omniskies pre 12.5?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:17 UTC+1 No.78502303 Report

>>78502257
>unpossible

we're done here
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:17 UTC+1 No.78502332 Report

>>78502126
Anon, if you don't control your cognitive dissonance I'm going to have to ask you to leave
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:17 UTC+1 No.78502365 Report

>>78502084
>The entire content of the alpha should be available to all backers, because that's the standard
What a good argument.
>that's what's fair
Though this is true. They should implement their credit system already.
>For fucks sake. Most people won't even be ABLE to use the new racing mode because they will be stuck in fucking auroras.
That's wrong. They'll be able to use it, they're just most likely going to lose.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:18 UTC+1 No.78502460 Report

>>78502271
A balance problem that you will notice they fixed.
A weapon being overpowered isnt pay to win if its not fucking supposed to be, and they then procede to fix that problem.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:21 UTC+1 No.78502718 Report

>>78502084
I understand your argument, but I'm just not feelin it.

And shirley they will let people loan 300is or something for the racing. Anything else would be a joke.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:22 UTC+1 No.78502835 Report

>>78502332
Fuck off regulas, nobody wants you here.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:22 UTC+1 No.78502873 Report

>>78502365
Oh, pardon. They just won't be able to win, since their speed is pathetic (the 300i is 40% faster than the pooroura for fucks sake) so it would be completely perfunctory and they shouldn't even bother. Why not just put trainer versions of ships in everybodies hangar so that everybody can test all aspects of the game, and a handful of wallet warriors don't get to give all the input?
>Wanting the Idris to have feedback exclusively from furries
>>78502460
It was OP and p2w for like 3 fucking months, dude, and balance problems are going to continue to show up. By limiting peoples ability to adapt they are limiting their ability to compete. All players having the same opportunities to compete is absolutely vital.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:23 UTC+1 No.78502964 Report

>>78502835
Fuck off Festinger, nobody wants you here
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:24 UTC+1 No.78503136 Report

>>78457272
>recently come back to monitoring SC
>go RSI homepage
>see what their doing with huds
>see new sexy varients of freelancer
>see FPS teaser
>see gamescom presentation

Holy fuck star citizen for GOTY 2020
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:25 UTC+1 No.78503191 Report

>>78502873
>Oh, pardon. They just won't be able to win, since their speed is pathetic (the 300i is 40% faster than the pooroura for fucks sake) so it would be completely perfunctory and they shouldn't even bother.
Yeah, there's a big difference between not even getting to play a mode unless you pay and just not being able to win.

>Why not just put trainer versions of ships in everybodies hangar so that everybody can test all aspects of the game, and a handful of wallet warriors don't get to give all the input?
Because 1) that's unnecessary from the testing side (the only side that you address this time), and 2) because that would upset the people that paid the most.

>>Wanting the Idris to have feedback exclusively from furries
If they ever want feedback from a specific ship at those volumes, they'd give everybody that ship.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:25 UTC+1 No.78503214 Report

>>78503136
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL1RXbZLHAI
Here have some candy
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:26 UTC+1 No.78503308 Report

>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:27 UTC+1 No.78503384 Report

>>78503308
>nice meme
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:27 UTC+1 No.78503397 Report

>>78502873
>All players having the same opportunities to compete is absolutely vital.
No its not. This isnt an Esport. Its not really that important, all that really matters is that players can have fun playing the game, which would be hampered by inevitably getting fucked by the dude who payed more.
Gold ammo in WoT is pay to win.
An unbalanced omnisky is not.
An expensive gun most people would have to pay to get in planetside 2, thats superior to most of the others, would be pay to win.
An unfixed balance issue is not. Especially considering anyone who paid for it whilst it was more powerful still has the same, nerfed gun when its fixed.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:28 UTC+1 No.78503549 Report

Is it worth it? My stock Aurora is no where near competitive. With the Leaderboards coming soon, should I?

Is it too much to ask to be able to use/test any ship and gun in Arena Commander considering this is a pre-alpha?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:29 UTC+1 No.78503646 Report

>>78503549
>Is it too much to ask to be able to use/test any ship and gun in Arena Commander considering this is a pre-alpha?
Yes.

>considering this is a pre-alpha?
It's alpha man.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:30 UTC+1 No.78503715 Report

>>78503549
Yes it is. Git gud faget.
No seriously, M3s are perfectly fine guns.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:30 UTC+1 No.78503772 Report

>>78503549
>tfw own Aurora
>tfw Whitley rates my guns 1 star
>tfw everyone in game has cash shop guns with 3 star ratings

Might as well play some korean cash shop game in the meantime :(
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:32 UTC+1 No.78503901 Report

>>78503715
By yes it is I meant yes your stock aurora is competitive.
Not that its too much to ask to be able to try different guns. Id like to be able to do that too.
But the M3s are fine. If you're having problems with heat its because your heatsinks are getting blown off, not the gun.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:32 UTC+1 No.78503993 Report

>>78503191
>Because 1) that's unnecessary from the testing side (the only side that you address this time), and 2) because that would upset the people that paid the most.
More people giving more feedback is always a better thing for testing. Them having a limited view of the game and its mechanics leads to uninformed opinions developing and then dominating. It would require no effort for them to give everybody the trainers.

And who gives a shit about the minority of turbo-retards that spent 5k on the game? They would have no legitimate reason for being upset, since pledge ships were ONLY supposed to affect your starting ships in the PU in a minimal way, and it was never said, implied or hinted at that they would have exclusive access to gameplay affecting content in the alpha phase. In fact, giving everybody access to the full game would be more in line with what CIG said they would be doing than this bullshit.
>>78503397
> Its not really that important, all that really matters is that players can have fun playing the game, which would be hampered by inevitably getting fucked by the dude who payed more.
That's EXACTLY WHAT IS HAPPENING THOUGH.
Want to have fun in the DFM when you're in an Aurora? Hornet will fuck you up if they are at the same skill level.

Want to have fun in the racing mode? Tough shit. 350r's and M50's will wreck your shit.

It doesn't have to be esports. In game advantages that are bought with real money and not achievable through gameplay is fucking gay
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:33 UTC+1 No.78504012 Report

This thread, man
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:33 UTC+1 No.78504081 Report

>>78503901
>your stock aurora is competitive.

Kill your self you in denial piece of shit fan boy nigger.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:34 UTC+1 No.78504135 Report

>>78503993
>That's EXACTLY WHAT IS HAPPENING THOUGH.
As an aurora pilot, I can tell you, no its not. At all. In the slightest.
You're operating on a stupid and naiive model of how fights and matches work.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:35 UTC+1 No.78504279 Report

>>78503993
>Want to have fun in the DFM when you're in an Aurora? Hornet will fuck you up if they are at the same skill level.
>Want to have fun in the racing mode? Tough shit. 350r's and M50's will wreck your shit.
>It doesn't have to be esports. In game advantages that are bought with real money and not achievable through gameplay is fucking gay

Wall said, faggot.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:36 UTC+1 No.78504320 Report

>>78503993
>More people giving more feedback is always a better thing for testing. Them having a limited view of the game and its mechanics leads to uninformed opinions developing and then dominating. It would require no effort for them to give everybody the trainers.
That's wrong. Mostly because they're not needing balance and specific ship info.

>And who gives a shit about the minority of turbo-retards that spent 5k on the game?
Not just those, but also the guys that paid for just a Hornet.
And the answer is Chris Roberts.

>since pledge ships were ONLY supposed to affect your starting ships in the PU in a minimal way
First time hearing that.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:38 UTC+1 No.78504521 Report

>>78504279
All of that doesn't matter. Wallet Warriors are funding this fame and will pay anything to feel special. They will never take their advantage from them and let people that paid under 60 bucks play on an even level playing field.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:38 UTC+1 No.78504536 Report

>>78504081
>[empty insults] you [empty insults] [empty insults] [empty insults] [empty insults]
Quality posting, friend.
>>78503993
>Want to have fun in the DFM when you're in an Aurora? Hornet will fuck you up if they are at the same skill level.
Thats not how it works at all though. Auroras arent supposed to go straight after horents, they're supposed to stick close to their friends and pick on the weak/unaware.
>Want to have fun in the racing mode? Tough shit. 350r's and M50's will wreck your shit.
They're almost certainly going to give people trainer 300s or m50s for racing, that they cant use in dogfighting.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:39 UTC+1 No.78504659 Report

>>78504536
>They're almost certainly going to give people trainer 300s or m50s for racing, that they cant use in dogfighting.
I'm pretty sure they said the opposite. Really sure that you can use the Aurora in the racing mode though.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:41 UTC+1 No.78504903 Report

>>78504536
>Thats not how it works at all though. Auroras arent supposed to go straight after horents, they're supposed to stick close to their friends and pick on the weak/unaware.

>Auroras are competitive

kill yourself retard
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:41 UTC+1 No.78504907 Report

>>78504320
>That's wrong. Mostly because they're not needing balance and specific ship info.
No, it isn't. More people using more parts of the game revealing more bugs that may be hard to replicate. By your logic, a public alpha test isn't even necessary since they could have their 12 man strong QA team do all of it.
>Not just those, but also the guys that paid for just a Hornet.
>And the answer is Chris Roberts.
Again, fuck them. Nobody signed on for this game based on promises of having massive advantages based on how much money you spent. The Hornet fags or wallet warriors that would be upset are a much smaller, and much less justified demographic than the majority of people who are fucked out of the vast majority of the game.
>First time hearing that.
How fucking new are you? It's been said a billion times, especially during the first days of pledging.
>>78504536
>Thats not how it works at all though. Auroras arent supposed to go straight after horents, they're supposed to stick close to their friends and pick on the weak/unaware.
They're only supposed to do that because they're worse than every other ship in the game, so that's the only way they can score a kill. It's not like they have special mechanics for that sort of playstyle, and a 300i or hornet could do it better.
>They're almost certainly going to give people trainer 300s or m50s for racing, that they cant use in dogfighting.
No, they aren't. They flat out said that they're having another sale, though!
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:41 UTC+1 No.78504908 Report

>>78503715
>>78504081
protip: if you havin heat problems I feel bad for you son, try rebinding your firegroups so they only shoot one.

m1 left gun, m2 right gun, then you can maintain fire for half the heat cost when you need to.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:43 UTC+1 No.78505014 Report

>>78504659
>racing auroras in my m50

That won't be any fun...
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:43 UTC+1 No.78505064 Report

>>78504908
>Playing with a mouse

Might as well play a sluggish point and shoot FPS game
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:45 UTC+1 No.78505302 Report

>>78504907
> It's not like they have special mechanics for that sort of playstyle, and a 300i or hornet could do it better.
So? They dont have to, so they dont. It still negates you're argument that auroras just get fucked by anyone who paid more. Clearly they dont, because there are ways to play to cope with being at a disadvantage. That lets you survive, kill and do damage, and have mostly as good survival as everyone else.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:45 UTC+1 No.78505325 Report

>>78505064
my gamepad wireless receiver died so I'm stuck with it for now. substitute m1 and m2 for whatever buttons are under your index finger on your favored peripheral.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:46 UTC+1 No.78505337 Report

>>78505014
No fucking kidding. This arrangement makes the game suck for EVERYONE that just wants to have fun. The only people who want the current system are those that NEED to win, and NEED to do it effortlessly by having a large advantage gained by money.

I have a fucking m50 and a Hornet. Do you think I have fun blowing up Auroras easily? Do you think it's going to be fun effortlessly outrunning people in races?

No. It's going to be BORING. INSANELY BORING AND FUCKING EASY. MIGHT AS WELL TURN ON CHEATS.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:47 UTC+1 No.78505485 Report

>>78505064
>mouse=point and click gimbals
Look at this retard, he doesnt even know about ctrl+F.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:47 UTC+1 No.78505567 Report

>>78505302
And you do all of it worse. Not fair, not fun, reliant on other people being bad instead of you yourself being good. The aurora is no fun to fly, and all of the other ships give a way better experience because they're not gimped beyond belief.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:48 UTC+1 No.78505669 Report

>>78505485
I've cleared all 15 Waves with a stock Aurora.

Mouse control = might as well play any regular FPS game
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:49 UTC+1 No.78505734 Report

>>78504907
>No, it isn't. More people using more parts of the game revealing more bugs that may be hard to replicate.
At some point the amount of bugs they get exceeds what they can fix. More does not equal better.

>By your logic, a public alpha test isn't even necessary since they could have their 12 man strong QA team do all of it.
Nope. Mostly because they need the huge amount of people for network bugs.

>Again, fuck them.
First time you're saying that though.

>Nobody signed on for this game based on promises of having massive advantages based on how much money you spent.
Really? Absolutely nobody bought a better ship because they thought it would help them win? Have you not seen the forum posts that were posted here?

>The Hornet fags or wallet warriors that would be upset are a much smaller, and much less justified demographic than the majority of people who are fucked out of the vast majority of the game.
I don't know about that, 2 and a half times more Auroras as 300is doesn't sound like "a much smaller" group.

>How fucking new are you? It's been said a billion times, especially during the first days of pledging.
Well if it's said a billion times, you can find mention of one, right? I sure as hell can't. You're just bullshitting.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:49 UTC+1 No.78505747 Report

>>78505337
I'm hoping double speed will be an equalizer, and speed/momentum management will be a bigger deal than just going fast. in the preview you can see several points where m50s go too fast and fuck themselves over. Very little of the Murray track is straightaway.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:50 UTC+1 No.78505872 Report

>>78505337
>I have a fucking m50 and a Hornet. Do you think I have fun blowing up Auroras easily? Do you think it's going to be fun effortlessly outrunning people in races?

>No. It's going to be BORING. INSANELY BORING AND FUCKING EASY. MIGHT AS WELL TURN ON CHEATS.
Every fucking time. EVERY. FUCKING. TIME
THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO SAY THAT THE AURORA GETS FUCKED ARE PEOPLE WHO DONT EVEN FUCKING FLY ONE.
WITHOUT FAIL.
"I KILL AURORAS, THEY MUST BE SHIT AND GET FUCKED BECAUSE OF THEIR SHIP!"
NIGGA U GAY
>>78505567
>And you do all of it worse.
And? You still do it perfectly well.
>Reliant on other people being bad
Not in the fucking slightest. Where the fuck did you get that from? It relies on you being good and your teammates being at least decent.
> The aurora is no fun to fly,
Maybe if all you care about is your score on the match board. You know, like a CoD kiddy.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:54 UTC+1 No.78506210 Report

>>78505872
You are, anon, a fuckwit.

>The aurora is no fun to fly,
>Maybe if all you care about is your score on the match board.

The 300i/Hornet can do ANTYHING that an Aurora can do but better.

That's it. Shut the fuck up.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:54 UTC+1 No.78506284 Report

>>78505872
>Implying I don't have an Aurora
Idiot. I have the m50, aurora, 300i, Hornet, and a lancer.
You're the same fag in here that just won't shut up about how your Aurora isn't a piece of shit. God. Same stupid argument, too. Fuck off.
>>78505872
>And? You still do it perfectly well.
>You do it worse but still perfectly fine
LOL WHAT THE FUCK. YOU ARE SO DUMB.
>Not in the fucking slightest. Where the fuck did you get that from? It relies on you being good and your teammates being at least decent
NO. IT RELIES ON THE ENEMY TEAM BEING WORSE THAN YOU AND YOUR TEAM.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:55 UTC+1 No.78506309 Report

>>78506210
That doesnt mean the aurora is unfun to fly you fucktard. Or even that those ships are more fun to fly.
Again, unless you're a fucking CoD child who only cares about scoring kills.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:56 UTC+1 No.78506475 Report

>>78505872
Next, this dumb nigger is going to be telling us how it's "OK" to fly Auroras in Race Mode against M50/300is
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:57 UTC+1 No.78506548 Report

>>78506284
>You do it worse but still perfectly fine
What are you even trying to say you dumbfuck? That you cant get as many kills in an aurora?
>NO. IT RELIES ON THE ENEMY TEAM BEING WORSE THAN YOU AND YOUR TEAM.
>It relies on you and your team being better than your opponents
>Relying on having more skill than your opposition
>bad
u wot.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:58 UTC+1 No.78506617 Report

>>78506309
>Again, unless you're a fucking CoD child who only cares about scoring kills.

The Aurora is not where close to being competitive. Stop posting already, dumb fuck.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:58 UTC+1 No.78506627 Report

>all this crying about the aurora
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:58 UTC+1 No.78506716 Report

>>78506475
Nice imaginary strawman chucklefuck. No, I wouldnt make that argument. Racing is different.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)21:59 UTC+1 No.78506742 Report

>>78505669
Wow, all 15 anon?

Thats impressive!

Git gud
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:00 UTC+1 No.78506875 Report

>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:00 UTC+1 No.78506913 Report

>>78506617
>[non-sequiter assertion of your own correctness, completely devoid of any actual argument]
>Stop posting!!!(please!!)
Stay mad.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:01 UTC+1 No.78506968 Report

>>78506716
Equal skilled

2 Hornet + 3 Aurora
2 Hornet + 3 300i

Who has the advantage?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:01 UTC+1 No.78506978 Report

05:07.015>>78506875
That's some crap ass quality you got there boy.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:02 UTC+1 No.78507156 Report

>>78506978
>05:07.015
That's not supposed to be there.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:02 UTC+1 No.78507162 Report

>>78506968
Your imaginary fantasy land of perfect thought experiments does not exist, and never will.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:03 UTC+1 No.78507185 Report

>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:03 UTC+1 No.78507193 Report

>>78506875
>Point and click bullshit

It looks like a slow moving FPS made for idiots
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:05 UTC+1 No.78507463 Report

>>78507162
Thanks for admitting that your argument is wrong.

>Auroras aren't gimped because they force you to play with teammates

Consider jumping off a tall building, cunt
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:05 UTC+1 No.78507493 Report

>>78506978
I could probably redo it smaller/shorter
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:06 UTC+1 No.78507543 Report

>>78506548
Are you fucking illiterate? It requires your team to be SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER than the enemy team to make up for the large disadvantage you're at for bringing a FUCKING AURORA INSTEAD OF A DECENT SHIP.

The enemy team, being at a similar skill level, if they brought 300i's and Hornets, would ASSRAPE YOU FOREVER YOU GODDAMN ILLITERATE RETARD OH FUCK I AM SO MAD. PEOPLE HAVE BEEN TELLING YOU THIS FOR LIKE A FUCKING MONTH AND YOU ARE SO GODDAMN THICK
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:06 UTC+1 No.78507558 Report

>>78507493
That one is only 1MB, the others are all 3MB. I think something went wrong there.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:08 UTC+1 No.78507719 Report

>>78507493
How much did those Mantis cash shop guns cost?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:08 UTC+1 No.78507734 Report

>>78507463
Yeah, no nigger.
It doesnt fucking matter what happens when two people of perfect equal skill meet, because that never happens. Ever. Even with sophisticated matchmaking.
My argument is right. Yours is a delusional mes that insists upon meaningless fantasies.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:09 UTC+1 No.78507868 Report

>>78507558
damn, how bout that. good thing I never delete the source videos
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:10 UTC+1 No.78507881 Report

>>78507543
>The enemy team, being at a similar skill level, if they brought 300i's and Hornets, would ASSRAPE YOU FOREVER
Except thats not what happens in any game ever.
> It requires your team to be SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER than the enemy team to make up for the large disadvantage you're at for bringing a FUCKING AURORA INSTEAD OF A DECENT SHIP.
Except thats not what happens. Ever. Because the aurora is decent.
Stay mad cock gobbler. Its because you know how wrong you are inside.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:10 UTC+1 No.78507896 Report

>>78507543
>GODDAMN ILLITERATE RETARD OH FUCK I AM SO MAD
Not even him, but L fucking L.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:10 UTC+1 No.78507898 Report

>>78507162
Your imaginary fantasy land of the Aurora being competitive doesn't exist, either.
>b-buht if you act like a vulture you can score some kills that other people did all the work for!
>even though the aurora is the worst at everything and has no reason to be flown, it's still a worthwhile ship
Just. Die.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:10 UTC+1 No.78507917 Report

>>78507734
>Auroras force you to play with others because they can't hold their own against Hornets/300i, therefore they are not weaker

Jumping from a building isn't the only method of suicide anon
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:11 UTC+1 No.78508040 Report

>>78507719
I actually just pulled them off the wingtips of my hornet trainer. I don't think they're even in the store, further confirmation that the AC hornet is OP
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:11 UTC+1 No.78508074 Report

>>78507881
>But it doesn't!
>Except no!
>Haha, I win!
>Literally just saying nu-uh
I think it's clear that you are just a shitposter.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:13 UTC+1 No.78508225 Report

>>78508040
Yeah, the Mantis isn't in the store.
Lol.
>AC not pay 2 win
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:14 UTC+1 No.78508395 Report

>>78508225
well hey now, it's not really pay to win if the best guns aren't even available to purchase.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:15 UTC+1 No.78508452 Report

>>78507917
I never argued they arent disadvantaged in a one on one fight against a hornet, anon.
Apparantly you're too fucking retarded to even understand the concept of someone saying that that does not mean what you think it does.
>>78507898
You were saying the aurora is no fun and will always get fucked when its flown. You're no longer trying to argue that. Now you carefully evade actually stating that dumbass argument. I wonder why.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:15 UTC+1 No.78508479 Report

>>78508395
They are available to purchase. Just buy the $125 dollar Hornet, and improve all of your ships drastically by swapping guns.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:17 UTC+1 No.78508647 Report

>>78508452
>I never argued they arent disadvantaged in a one on one fight

Great, this is over. They have no advantage in acting as a support/wingman over a 300i/Hornet either.

Now shut the fuck up
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:18 UTC+1 No.78508726 Report

>>78508074
But it literally doesnt you dumb motherfucker. I know because I fly an aurora. You're making a statement about what happens in the video game that is directly contradictory to all evidence gained by PLAYIN' VIDYA GAEM.
This literally just went
>NUH UH AURORAS JUST GET ASSRAPED FOREVER I WIN FAGGOT FUCK YOU FUCKK YUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>No they dont. Thats not what happens. Ever.
>YUH HUH YEAH IT IS THATS WHAT HAPPENS UR DUMB FUCK U
You are hilariously mad.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:19 UTC+1 No.78508842 Report

>open thread
>cigdrone delusion has reached new high
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:19 UTC+1 No.78508896 Report

>>78508647
>They have no advantage in acting as a support/wingman over a 300i/Hornet either.
No, they dont.
I never argued that either.
What the fuck is wrong with you? I argued that they're fun to fly, can survive perfectly decently without getting assraped, and do damage/get kills. The idea that an aurora joins a game and gets repeatedly fucked by a hornet is flagrantly incorrect.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:20 UTC+1 No.78509037 Report

>>78508896
>No, they dont.
>I never argued that either.
>What the fuck is wrong with you? I argued that they're fun to fly

Case closed. Cya nigger
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:21 UTC+1 No.78509093 Report

>>78508726
Idiot. I have all the current ships, and everybody else that does, too, can tell you that the Aurora is literally the worst at any potential role. It's the worst wingman. It's the worst 1v1. There is no reason to take it. Ever. This makes it not fun to play with, because it also handles and wobbles around like dogshit in addition to being the worst at everything.

And you're pretending like it has a viable role to play. Like it has some sort niche to fulfill. Delusional fuccboi.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:23 UTC+1 No.78509296 Report

>>78509093
>the Aurora is literally the worst at any potential role.

Largest cargo capacity of any single seater craft.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:23 UTC+1 No.78509310 Report

>>78509093
You were trying to argue that
> worst at any potential role
equated to
>just constantly gets stomped and fucked by better ship
Which it doesnt.
So it turns out you're just a CoD kiddy with shit taste who doesnt like something if he cant 'dominate' with it.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:24 UTC+1 No.78509443 Report

>>78509310
>m-my game is NOT Pay4Advantage
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:25 UTC+1 No.78509509 Report

>>78509310
>Moving goalposts this hard
>Already conceded all the major points
Looks like we're done here. Have "fun" being gimped. I hear paraplegics can have fun, too. Maybe you should try it out.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:25 UTC+1 No.78509615 Report

>>78509443
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WindmillPolitical
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:25 UTC+1 No.78509627 Report

ignore the p2w faggots guys
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:27 UTC+1 No.78509786 Report

>>78509627
The more you pay, the stronger your ship/guns are. It's that fucking simple.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:27 UTC+1 No.78509818 Report

>>78509509
>Moving goalposts
Fun fact anon, you being a retard doesnt mean the other guy was arguing what your retard brain thought they were.
>continuing to incriminate yourself as a child who cant enjoy anything if he cant 'pwn N00BZ'
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:28 UTC+1 No.78509874 Report

>>78509627
I cant, I only paid for an aurora.
The pay2win faggots are all flying hornets and beating my ass.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:28 UTC+1 No.78509890 Report

>>78509786
And the more crew you require, the more it costs to run, and the more vulnerable you are to munitions like torpedoes. Its that fucking simple.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:29 UTC+1 No.78510029 Report

>fags still raging about the aurora being shit
>webms of aurora rekking hornets and 300is ignored
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:31 UTC+1 No.78510224 Report

>>78510029
So do you just eject when you run out of ammo?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:32 UTC+1 No.78510314 Report

>>78510029
>Look at my selective webms guys
Yeah. I'm sure there's not about a billion times more examples of Auroras getting analblitterated.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:32 UTC+1 No.78510342 Report

>>78510029
You know they dont care about reality, anon.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:33 UTC+1 No.78510497 Report

>>78510224
You ram someone. Also the best course of action if you run out of missiles and bust a heatsink, with energy weapons.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:35 UTC+1 No.78510654 Report

>>78510029
No shit he is winning in these webms when he is using hornet guns.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:35 UTC+1 No.78510676 Report

>>78510029
Webms with the overpowered Hornet Mantis guns that you can only get by owning a Hornet.

Great proof. Maybe show ones we're you're using craptastic 300i or aurora guns.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:36 UTC+1 No.78510774 Report

>>78510497
what he said
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:37 UTC+1 No.78510823 Report

>>78510676
Id just like to point out that it kinda proves, if it proves anything, that the actual ship is balanced and equal but its starter guns are whats gimped.
Thats probably wrong and stupid, but thats what this logic implies.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:39 UTC+1 No.78511071 Report

>>78510823
>that the actual ship is balanced

>A ship that has less hardpoints, much slower, equal shields, horrendous maneuverability, smaller missile racks

>none of these things matter in combat
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:40 UTC+1 No.78511109 Report

>>78510823
No, it just proves that overpowered weaponry can help make up for an inferior ship. They're better on the Hornet, since better shields, faster, more maneuverable etc. No shit that better guns allow you to shred other people easier if you get the drop on them.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:40 UTC+1 No.78511151 Report

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmx7JM_vRh8

best piece of music so far
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:41 UTC+1 No.78511240 Report

>>78511071
I think you're missing the point of the Aurora.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:41 UTC+1 No.78511283 Report

>>78511071
>So defensive and mad that he attacks him for something he never actually claimed
maximal kekkage
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:42 UTC+1 No.78511394 Report

>>78511240
Why would the point of a ship be to be worse than every other ship in the known universe at everything
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:42 UTC+1 No.78511442 Report

>everyone conveniently forgets the load of money p2w fag will have at their disposal to buy the best guns, shields and other modules on day one

Maybe if CIG closed the pledge store before people stockpiled dozens of ships to sell off, this could be avoided.

Doesnt look like happening any time soon.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:43 UTC+1 No.78511493 Report

>>78511394
You're embarrassing yourself, you know.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:43 UTC+1 No.78511565 Report

>>78511493
What? It was a question. Answer it, you cumrag.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:44 UTC+1 No.78511583 Report

>>78511394
see
>>78509296
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:44 UTC+1 No.78511642 Report

>>78511394
It's cheap, has decent cargo space, can be used for long duration trips (ie has a bed). It's a decent ship, just not a dedicated fighter.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:44 UTC+1 No.78511665 Report

>Chris says it's not your ship, it's your equipment
>no one listens
>Arena Commander proves it
>no one cares

Well this has been enlightening
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:46 UTC+1 No.78511912 Report

>>78511665
Welcome to /scg/, enjoy your stay.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:47 UTC+1 No.78511983 Report

>>78511665
>>>/ved/
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:47 UTC+1 No.78512031 Report

Just because the game developer is letting you dick around with what they've finished so far, and actually gone out of their way to make it more fun for you to do so, doesn't mean they have to accommodate your retarded desire to play with literally everything or your retarded desire to "win" while the purpose is testing. The fact that you even care about p2w before the game is released makes you a fucking retard tick parasite that feels entitled to all the blood it can suck because it made a donation, the meaning of which has been explained by CIG a thousand million times over.

>TL;DR wahhhh auroras are at a disadvantage to other ships I should get to fly a hornet because I care about winning in alpha, not about testing aurora and giving CIG aurora feedback
Fuck off until game release if that's your attitude.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:49 UTC+1 No.78512298 Report

>>78512031
>aurora feedback

Anyone that sees the stats knows its shit. Devs have to be utterly retarded and Newtonian combat virgins to not know this
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:50 UTC+1 No.78512412 Report

>>78510654
>Using other guns is cheating!
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:51 UTC+1 No.78512483 Report

>>78512031
>Just because you paid money for a product that stated you would have alpha access to doesn't mean you're entitled to play the ENTIRE GAME
Lmao. Fuck off, faggot. No alpha has ever locked all of the content behind massive paywalls. Kill yourself, bruh.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:52 UTC+1 No.78512616 Report

>>78512483
>>Just because you paid money for a product that stated you would have alpha access to doesn't mean you're entitled to play the ENTIRE GAME
That's exactly right.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:53 UTC+1 No.78512706 Report

>>78510676
a few of the ones posted are actually using the base guns, in fact.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:54 UTC+1 No.78512856 Report

>>78512298
>it's shit, it shouldn't be shit
>therefore it should be the opposite. it should be awesome
>every other ship is supposed to be better. therefore they should get progressively more awesome than awesome, into an infinity of awesomeness
I wish you were a game designer.

>>78512483
>>78512616
You guys are just too stupid to understand the concept of crowdfunding, aren't you?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:55 UTC+1 No.78512997 Report

>>78512856
>You guys are just too stupid to understand the concept of crowdfunding, aren't you?
Why are you saying that? What do you think I (>>78512616) got wrong?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:55 UTC+1 No.78513047 Report

>>78512706
Amazing tactics.
>Visible lagging
>Only gets a few ineffectual shots off
>rams
>not even sure if you got the kill or not

Awesome ship broski.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:57 UTC+1 No.78513241 Report

>CIG doesn't suddenly refuse all pledges entirely; doesn't say, "NO, FUCK YOU, WE WON'T ACCEPT MORE PLEDGES"
>Also doesn't let anyone who pledged for a skin fly any ship they want any time the instant it's completed by the team
>LAWL MASSIVE PAYWALLS
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:58 UTC+1 No.78513375 Report

>>78513047
that's a pretty old one; we actually rubberbanded into each other.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:59 UTC+1 No.78513414 Report

>>78512997
I thought you were being sarcastic. Never mind.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)22:59 UTC+1 No.78513425 Report

>>78513241
>VAPORWARE
>GREATEST SCAM OF THE CENTURY
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)23:07 UTC+1 No.78514389 Report

>>78513375
Yeah, you smoothly rammed him. So no.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)23:18 UTC+1 No.78515752 Report

>>78512706
So are they going to let you decouple the reticule so joystick users can use a hat to finely aim like that instead of having to use the boresight + aim assist, or what?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)23:19 UTC+1 No.78515945 Report

>>78498245
>890 JUMP wasn't impressive either

Source? Where did you see it?
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)23:20 UTC+1 No.78516015 Report

>>78515752
CR said that they were going to try and do something about it next patch, so expect it to be fixed shortly before PU launch, yes.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)23:21 UTC+1 No.78516173 Report

>>78514389
you'll notice my vector indicator is below center; I was trying to dodge under him. seriously, you can see him bouncing up and down.

>>78515752
I'm surprised you can't now. Gamepad can do it.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)23:22 UTC+1 No.78516250 Report

>>78515945
That leak awhile ago.

Looked like a bad space yacht to me
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)23:29 UTC+1 No.78516986 Report

The 890 jump looks very cool. Every complaint about it I read was idiots with no imagination not even understanding the scale of what they were looking at and thinking there were no windows when there clearly were.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)23:38 UTC+1 No.78518124 Report

>>78496695
Hammond is a filthy 350rfag.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)23:43 UTC+1 No.78518697 Report

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=g0ZRNLw2omA#t=483
>Especially what will drop in a week's time
1 WEEK
ONE WEEK
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)23:44 UTC+1 No.78518823 Report

>>78518697
That's not how you spell 2 weeks.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)23:45 UTC+1 No.78518931 Report

>>78518697
Gotta add CIG bloat to that timeframe, so 2 weeks is more accurate.
>>
Anonymous 08/29/14(Fri)23:59 UTC+1 No.78520578 Report

>>78518697
SQD42 confirmed for 2 weeks
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)00:02 UTC+1 No.78520980 Report

>>78518697
>CR sees himself as a dungeon master of the PU

this is a concept i can get behind
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)00:18 UTC+1 No.78522819 Report

>>78518697
any new footage from PAX? looks like old assets interspersed in the interview
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)00:35 UTC+1 No.78524746 Report

>>78522819
CIG doesn't have a booth, nor are they presenting anything. They're just attending it as people.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)00:36 UTC+1 No.78524804 Report

>>78518697
where's this map anyway, this is what I wanted in AC, fuck Dying Star. Give me cool geometry I can use, not just pretty skyboxes.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)00:37 UTC+1 No.78524937 Report

>>78524804
It was an environment made for the trailer. It's not a playable map.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)00:39 UTC+1 No.78525158 Report

>>78501003
Actually it was, we all very well knew that we would only be able to use our ships we bought in alpha and beta until the economic system was advanced enough to support earning credits. Everyone knew it. Chris himself said it numerous times that we would be able to use the ships we bought
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)00:40 UTC+1 No.78525297 Report

>>78525158
dont feed the p2w troll

replying to him only gives more cause for him to run in circles flinging shit everywhere
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)00:42 UTC+1 No.78525445 Report

>>78524937
seems like a waste of resources to build an environment just for a game trailer. it looks more fun to play in and around than what we have now, too.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)00:42 UTC+1 No.78525527 Report

>>78525297
>>>>/RSI/
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)00:43 UTC+1 No.78525648 Report

>>78524804
confirmed for never playing capture the core
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)00:48 UTC+1 No.78526150 Report

>>78525648
that broken shell ain't in CtC nigga, I've played both maps.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)00:49 UTC+1 No.78526328 Report

>>78526150
I meant that CtC has lots of useful obstacles. You're right, it doesn't have those exact ones.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)01:11 UTC+1 No.78528905 Report

>>78475942
It reeks of mediocrity. 3/10

I was going to mute the in game music anyways.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)01:13 UTC+1 No.78529216 Report

I'm not getting a patch yet guys, is it broken?

Where is the racing?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)01:19 UTC+1 No.78529917 Report

>>78526328
CtC is pretty cool, but I have a hardon for that moonlet shell.

Also, I just discovered you can mess with the HUD without being tabbed out of the ship controls, neato.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:01 UTC+1 No.78534298 Report

TWO WEEKS THEY SAID
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:07 UTC+1 No.78534847 Report

>>78475942

Every song from Pedro sounds generic, there are some good background songs for the game, but he needs to make at least one catchy melody for a main theme.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:08 UTC+1 No.78534910 Report

>>78493606
Reminder that moot maintains a personal blog and the 4chan blog on the tumblr platform.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:22 UTC+1 No.78536064 Report

>>78475942
It's just a house track without any base or drums. Also he ripped off the tune from a song I wrote for my band when I was 16 I want royalties.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:27 UTC+1 No.78536519 Report

>>78475942
What a cluster fuck of genre cliches awkwardly lumped on top of each other
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:30 UTC+1 No.78536802 Report

>>78534847
I don't disagree, but videogame music is enhanced by listening to it while playing the game...the same way movie music is memorable because of the scene it plays with.

Take "Lukes Theme" by Williams. I mean the whole score is decent at best, but when you combine "Lukes Theme" with the shot of him looking towards the horizon with two setting suns, and all the emotions that led up to that moment, it becomes iconic.

The problem here is we're listening to Pedros music OUTSIDE of it's natural environment, which is inside the game. It's hard to do, but try listening to Star Wars music without remembering the scene, moment or characters involved with it...it's literally impossible. Better yet, find a kid who hasn't seen the original trilogy and have them objectively listen to it.

So, try to remember a track or theme from Avatar (Cameron). It isn't like traditional classical music where it's designed to be complete and beautiful on it's own, Pedros music is designed to enhance or accentuate a scene or moment, and until you experience that moment or scene you should really reserve judgement on the score.

Love, Pedro
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:35 UTC+1 No.78537226 Report

>>78536802
That song fucking sucks. Just because you are going to be feeling good while you are racing in game to it doesn't do anything to improve the music.

What if good music played during these iconic game and movie moments?

Will it be double gooder?

The music sucks, that's it
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:40 UTC+1 No.78537653 Report

>>78536802
>Pedros music is designed to enhance or accentuate a scene or moment

I agree, that acid appregio awkwardly layered over some orchestra strings really fits the game. I really appreciate that nauseating transition into breakbeats at the end too. It really makes me feel the Zero G.

shut the fuck up
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:41 UTC+1 No.78537754 Report

>>78536802
>the same way movie music is memorable because of the scene it plays with.
Just because good music is complimented well by a good scene doesn't mean that the music is only memorable or good because of that. Star Wars is instantly recognizable because it's actually interesting to listen to based on its own merits.

Pedro's is just boring. His music is like oatmeal without any flavoring.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:41 UTC+1 No.78537785 Report

>>78518697
That means we are halfway to it compared to gamescon, thus 2 weeks
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:42 UTC+1 No.78537880 Report

LOL, all these angry fags. Just turn off the music and play your own, manchildren.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:43 UTC+1 No.78537957 Report

>>78537880
>Only manchildren critique!
>If you don't like it leave xD!
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:43 UTC+1 No.78537978 Report

>>78537880
What do you expect from people that get all analpained about train design
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:44 UTC+1 No.78537990 Report

>>78537653
fuck off nerd, nobody cares
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:45 UTC+1 No.78538106 Report

>>78537990
>we don't even care about a good score anyway. f-fuck off
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:47 UTC+1 No.78538268 Report

>>78538106
>I-I'll add a stutter to make him sound upset
really though, you're mad as fuck and saying nothing of substance. "it's shit" is not critique.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:48 UTC+1 No.78538387 Report

>not turning off music in every game for immersion

unless I see jesper kydd in the credits I usually don't bother
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:48 UTC+1 No.78538392 Report

>>78537957
>>78537653
>>78537226
>>78538106
Jesus fucking christ you people are vitriolic.
Its like you deliberately look for new things to be bitter and pissy about.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:49 UTC+1 No.78538497 Report

>>78538392
That track blows horse dicks. Deal with it
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:50 UTC+1 No.78538517 Report

>>78538387
>music hurts immersion
>your engrossment in the world and immersion in the space fantasy is actually harmed by background music
Thats the most 'spergers thing ive heard since. No, wait, this is /scg/, theres far worse constantly, but thats still pretty damn spergers.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)02:50 UTC+1 No.78538547 Report

>>78538392
>Its like you deliberately look for new things to be bitter and pissy about.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:00 UTC+1 No.78539319 Report

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14111-Arena-Commander-V9-Status-Update

Pack it up boys
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:01 UTC+1 No.78539401 Report

>>78537754
>Hating on plane oats.

It's like you don't even do squats.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:01 UTC+1 No.78539414 Report

>>78539319
You knew this was going to be the case. There was no reason to expect it to be released today, after the things theyd said preceding.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:04 UTC+1 No.78539652 Report

>>78539401
Cardio is easier
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:04 UTC+1 No.78539665 Report

>>78539319
It's Pedro's fault.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:05 UTC+1 No.78539792 Report

>>78539319
>we will be providing continued updates in the coming week on the status of the release.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:06 UTC+1 No.78539852 Report

>>78539319
>and the now-flyable M50 and 350R
>no Avenger

FUCK CIG
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:06 UTC+1 No.78539903 Report

>>78539792
That line caught me too. But they're working over the weekend for things to happen. I guess that one was just a show of confidence for things?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:09 UTC+1 No.78540085 Report

>>78539903
>>78539792
Expect it next friday. Unless they have it REALLY well done and polished up earlier than that. If not, they'll not release it till friday even if its ready, taking the extra time to shine it up more whether it really needs it or not.
Or, so Id bet, myself, anyway.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:09 UTC+1 No.78540097 Report

>Put alpha down to wait on more updates
>Come back 2 months later
>60 FUCKING GIGS OF "PATCHES"

Yeah, I can tell you right now the player base for this game is never going to stay above 2-3000 online simultaneously.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:09 UTC+1 No.78540110 Report

>>78539319
we will be providing continued updates in the coming two weeks on the status of the release.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:09 UTC+1 No.78540116 Report

>>78539852
why can't they drop those into AC as a little minipatch? nobody gives a fuck about leaderboards, holy shit.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:09 UTC+1 No.78540152 Report

>>78539903
They're covering their asses in case it's not released next week.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:10 UTC+1 No.78540206 Report

>>78539852
It just shows how inept ciggy is at following their plans
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:11 UTC+1 No.78540295 Report

>>78540152
Yeah, no. Its placating the forums to keep them from absolutely exploding.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:11 UTC+1 No.78540345 Report

>>78540097
the fuck are you talking about, there's been maybe 3 patches in the last 2 months, by far the biggest being about 9 gigs.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:12 UTC+1 No.78540403 Report

>>78540097
Yeah that never happens. You may have had 6 patches that were 10 gigs each, but that's because they force you to redownload the entire thing every time they release a major patch.

Are you pretending to be retarded?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:13 UTC+1 No.78540448 Report

>>78540206
They never promised or planned to put the avenger in 0.9 you stupid konglet. It was an 'If we get that ready too yeah thatd be awesome'
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:13 UTC+1 No.78540484 Report

Racing random people online sucks shit with weapons&collisions, why this shit gets in baffles me
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:14 UTC+1 No.78540558 Report

>>78540345
>being about 9 gigs
No, you probably had to redownload half the game files since the updates break things like that sometimes.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:14 UTC+1 No.78540585 Report

>>78540448
Yeah well I just hope you can get in it after 0.9...or it has, like, wheels and shit.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:14 UTC+1 No.78540589 Report

>>78540484
The normal racing gamemode doesnt have weapons faggot. There are two racing gamemodes, one with weapons one without. The former will probably be shit, yeah, but you dont have to play it.
>Vehicles in racing games should intangibly pass through one another
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:15 UTC+1 No.78540640 Report

citizencon
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:15 UTC+1 No.78540665 Report

>>78540448
AC manual clearly shows avenger as next ship, off mark vedfag
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:16 UTC+1 No.78540770 Report

>>78540585
Does it really matter that your interaction with your static dollhouse is limited?
>>78540665
What the hell are you on about?
>Fluff manual
>important and conformational source on development
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:16 UTC+1 No.78540780 Report

>>78540403
You're goddamn right I had 6 patches that were 8-12 gigs each.

I finally said fuck it, I literally downloaded and played two other new games in the time one patch took.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:17 UTC+1 No.78540824 Report

>He didn't buy an Avenger.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:19 UTC+1 No.78540970 Report

>>78540780
Pretty sure you're better off just uninstalling and redownloading it outright. It should give you the latest version plus maybe a small patch and you're done.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:20 UTC+1 No.78541095 Report

>>78540824
>He didn't buy a merchantman
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:21 UTC+1 No.78541186 Report

>>78540780
I patch pretty fast. In fact it takes me longer to apply a patch than to download it..I have fiber optic though.

If your internet is rough though, fire that up before you go to bed, that's what I would do.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:23 UTC+1 No.78541356 Report

>>78541095
>>78540824
>not supporting the friendship and cooperation between our two species by purchasing a xi'an khartu-al fighter
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:23 UTC+1 No.78541368 Report

Fucking Labor Day.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:24 UTC+1 No.78541440 Report

>>78540558
actually I did, yeah. Still, 60 GB is complete bullshit.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:26 UTC+1 No.78541565 Report

>>78541440
Could you have just deleted the entire game and downloaded from scratch?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:29 UTC+1 No.78541837 Report

>they're working holiday weekend to burn money faster through paying themselves so they can beg for more or go tits up

And no modders will save it because CE a undoc'd shit
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:29 UTC+1 No.78541902 Report

>>78541565
I try to avoid it since I have capped internet, unless it looks like the patches are bigger.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:34 UTC+1 No.78542287 Report

>>78541368

>kitchen employee detected
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:34 UTC+1 No.78542293 Report

>>78540970
They are clearly pissed I only have an aurora and are trying to punish me.

Speaking of which, why are they so stingy with the M50? You'd think they'd want the money that would come from selling them more freely.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:37 UTC+1 No.78542537 Report

>>78541837
what
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:38 UTC+1 No.78542659 Report

>>78542293
they'll have an m50 sale the weekend after .9 comes out and everyone realizes they need one to be competitive.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:43 UTC+1 No.78543036 Report

>>78542659
And by "sale" you mean will sell for at least as much as last time, most likely more
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:43 UTC+1 No.78543046 Report

>>78542659
>Murray Cup Trailer
>Avenger touches down on a swag condo to watch the race from with bros.
>No Avenger racing in the trailer
>Aegis peasant
>You bought an Avenger
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:44 UTC+1 No.78543149 Report

Here's a dumb thought, does anybody else want to see the Murray Cup map afailable for straight fighting and CtC? All that geometry would make it a lot more exciting than the wide open spaces between cap points we have in Broken Moon and Dying Star
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:45 UTC+1 No.78543227 Report

>>78543046
>orgin peasants entertaining aegis nobility as they sit from afar and watch the plebeians play their games
Feels good.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:47 UTC+1 No.78543394 Report

>>78543227
>aegis plebs think watching pewdipie is entertainment
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:49 UTC+1 No.78543509 Report

>but have made the tough decision not to release until it meets the standards you’ve come to expect
>the standards you've come to expect
>standards
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:50 UTC+1 No.78543638 Report

>>78543509
So just imagine how bad it must be if they DON'T want to release it.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:51 UTC+1 No.78543707 Report

>log into SC
>my hangar is now much larger
>hornet and 300i are there now
>m50 is there now

damn it feels good to be middle class
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:53 UTC+1 No.78543868 Report

>>78543707
>don't log in to the game in months
>don't care how crappy it is right now
>still chuckle at what people say in this thread

I guess I won't touch this shit until the fps module comes out. Then... maybe it'll be somewhat fun.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:53 UTC+1 No.78543913 Report

>>78543868
The multiplayer is actually pretty good right now though. Id highly recommend it.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:54 UTC+1 No.78543969 Report

>>78543638
>So just imagine how bad it must be if they DON'T want to release it.
I politely decline.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:54 UTC+1 No.78544005 Report

>>78543036
Most likely, unless they do the right thing and give you "trainers", but it seems more likely that they're going to let you race in retarded SHOULDN'T-BE-RACING type ships just to give you a taste and to inspire the sales of racing ships. Then again, the M50 was originally sold on the idea of racing and most people that originally bought it did so for exactly that purpose. Simple fact is that this new mode is going to alienate anyone who was kinda "meh" about racing in the first place.

BUT racing is easier to pull off than exploring, salvaging, pirating, etc...as far as a module is concerned. But since it's the "new mode" everyone will want to play it and people who haven't bought into that play style with their ship pledges will be on-the-ropes...so to speak. So yeah CIG, create an entire game mode and implement it into the game with leaderboards to appease the fraction of a percentage of people that pledged for Star Citizen in order to "race spaceships", and be sure to make sure no one who pledged for the game with the intention of playing it a different way can participate in any meaningful way.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)03:58 UTC+1 No.78544315 Report

>>78544005
>People didn't get an M50 to simulate futuristic space podracing
>Bought avengers instead
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:04 UTC+1 No.78544809 Report

Anyone got a link to the new JP? I couldn't spot it in this thread.

>>78544005
Racing is better for testing the flight mechanics than exploring. It almost sounds like you are mad because it's in the game at all.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:04 UTC+1 No.78544856 Report

>>78543046
>>You bought an Avenger

it's not fair

>>78540824
don't joke ;_;
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:08 UTC+1 No.78545126 Report

I can't wait for the avenger to get put in just to blow these idiots the fuck out
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:08 UTC+1 No.78545149 Report

>>78457272
does anyone have a link to the latest Jump point?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:10 UTC+1 No.78545317 Report

>>78545149
you just linked to it yourself, genius.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:12 UTC+1 No.78545437 Report

>>78545317
>https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14113-Jump-Point-Now-Available

go fuck your self autist
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:12 UTC+1 No.78545470 Report

>>78545317
no he didn't
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:14 UTC+1 No.78545609 Report

I think the JP link is broken for subscribers atm
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:15 UTC+1 No.78545736 Report

>Not using a P-52 Merlin for racing when it's flyable.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:16 UTC+1 No.78545787 Report

>>78545437
ah, didn't realize the new one was up. Here's an idea, why don't you get mad and insult people over it? That usually gets you what you want around here
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:18 UTC+1 No.78546024 Report

>>78545736
>Phoenix pulls up at the starting line
>everyone laughs at the fat tub
>race begins
>it flounders behind pathetically
>see it sinking in the rearview
>suddenly an orange blur shoots past
>fucking p-75
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:20 UTC+1 No.78546207 Report

>>78546024
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:21 UTC+1 No.78546219 Report

>>78545787
>I'm a giant faggot
That's what you sound like anon, why do you even support this stupid game anyways?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:22 UTC+1 No.78546336 Report

>All these fags bragging and dreaming about their racers.

Fuck racing. I got my 350r because it's a very fast ship with 2 size 3 missile hardpoints.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:23 UTC+1 No.78546413 Report

>>78545787

he did. he told you to fuck yourself autist, and he posted a genius. it's sarcastiable because you told him that he's a genius get it
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:23 UTC+1 No.78546417 Report

>>78546207
Redline is the DBZ of racing.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:24 UTC+1 No.78546530 Report

the jumpoint isn't actually up

the link is broken

typical CIG
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:26 UTC+1 No.78546716 Report

>>78545437
Give link to actual pdf for nonsubscribers
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:27 UTC+1 No.78546815 Report

>>78546716

the link to the actual PDF is broken. check the comments on that comm link
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:31 UTC+1 No.78547115 Report

>>78546716
>Give link to actual pdf for nonsubscribers
>no such thing. CIG wants you to pay money for them to keep you informed. Because the only way to provide this info is in an expensively produced magazine.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:34 UTC+1 No.78547398 Report

>>78545437
>Attention Development Subscribers!
>development subscribers
I point this out every month, but has anyone else noticed that they slowly went from referring to them as community subscribers, and talking about how they only funded community extras and thus got perks outside the game, to giving them little stuff in game, planning bigger stuff for them in game (test flight tokens for example) and have made a point of calling them development subscribers? I feel like they're gearing up to make the subs a part of the game itself into post-release.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:34 UTC+1 No.78547406 Report

>>78547115
i'm mad at the link being broken but this is stupid fucking bait

the JPs are always linked here within minutes, anyone can read them

fuck off retarded baitposter
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:35 UTC+1 No.78547469 Report

>>78546716
>>78546815
>>78547115

i'm a non-subscriber, thats why i was asking and i was just proving that the newest one was "supposed to" be up.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:36 UTC+1 No.78547589 Report

>>78547469
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)04:49 UTC+1 No.78548767 Report

>>78547589
That was calming, thanks anon
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)05:00 UTC+1 No.78549727 Report

>>78547406
You forgot to thank subscribers
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)05:27 UTC+1 No.78551887 Report

I can't wait to use my Aurora in the Murray Cup. That great speed and handling. Oh wait, I'm going to have to drop another 50 bucks on top of trading it in to have fun with it.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)05:30 UTC+1 No.78552178 Report

hello scg

I've been following this game for a bit and want to pledge.

is the avenger a good ship to start?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)05:31 UTC+1 No.78552207 Report

>>78551887
>all these fags making their choices based upon temporary benefits instead of seeing that their ships will have superior cargo abilities to most of the earlier ships
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)05:31 UTC+1 No.78552216 Report

>>78551887
cant wait to wreck fool while i zoom by them in my M50 that i got for free.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)05:32 UTC+1 No.78552320 Report

>>78552216
can't wait to skim past m50 owners who are too fast for their own good with my superior drifting skills.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)05:32 UTC+1 No.78552328 Report

>>78552178
Its going to be a fast ship with good guns and good cargo, but probably less than stellar maneuvering.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)05:35 UTC+1 No.78552598 Report

>>78552320
>implying the M50 doesnt have superior braking power
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)05:36 UTC+1 No.78552657 Report

>>78552216
How'd you get it for free?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)05:37 UTC+1 No.78552759 Report

>>78552657
won it off a online broadcast for imperium

http://radio.starcitizenbase.com/

they give shit out every now and then
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)05:39 UTC+1 No.78552941 Report

>>78552178
what he
>>78552328
said.
Fuckhuge gun, fuckhuge engine(sanic fast), probably wont be great at maneuvering. It also has really decent cargo capabilities, but I suspect those might be nerfed in the future.
Still, thats just wild conjecture on my part.
>>78552207
>"earlier ships"
The idea of this being a thing is slightly worrisome. It wont be so bad if it really is just the aurora mustang and 300 series(then whatever works as a 'path' for whatever niche or combination of abilities you personally find appealing), but itd be stupid and rather unfun for everyone to be flying huge cargo vessels and military gunboats after a few months.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)05:46 UTC+1 No.78553443 Report

>>78552178
>>78552328
>>78552941
>avenger

cmon now
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)05:54 UTC+1 No.78554109 Report

>>78553443
Master motha fuckin race nigga.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:02 UTC+1 No.78554695 Report

Have the origin 890 ship details been released yet?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:06 UTC+1 No.78555053 Report

>>78554109
why do you lie to yourself?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:07 UTC+1 No.78555129 Report

>>78552598
>implying it does
you'll have to turn the fucker 180 to slow as fast as you accelerate.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:08 UTC+1 No.78555206 Report

>>78555053
You lie to yourself because you know deep inside you should have bought an avenger, anon. Why else?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:12 UTC+1 No.78555491 Report

>>78555206
why? why do you give yourself so much buyers remorse and post purchase rationalization? it's was only, what? $70?

just fucking sell it and stop tricking yourelf. it's not good.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:13 UTC+1 No.78555581 Report

Is the jump point link fixed yet?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:13 UTC+1 No.78555626 Report

>>78555491
>Implying I even bought an avenger
>Implying im not going to acquire one once the PU launches rather than wasting real money on something I can aquire by playing a fun video game
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:13 UTC+1 No.78555629 Report

>>78554695
It's had stats on the stats page for a while now

Its landing gear looks like this
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:17 UTC+1 No.78555870 Report

>>78555629
Where?

I can't see any pictures.I don't want to know stuff like engine thrust or whatever,I just want to know what it looks like inside and how many it holds.

It's outrageous to me that these people have all these stretch goals and can't keep up with what they've already promised.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:18 UTC+1 No.78555924 Report

>>78555581
Yes
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:19 UTC+1 No.78556041 Report

>>78555870
>>78555629
>>78554695
or in other words,where the space jacuzzi and fancy bed for fucking bitches is.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:19 UTC+1 No.78556048 Report

Jump Point link is fixed

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/apmj51ok8v1iar/source/JumpPoint_02-08_Aug_14_The-Stars-Align.pdf

It's kinda meh
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:20 UTC+1 No.78556108 Report

>>78555870
>it's outrageous that game isn't instatntly ready to meet your demands

this is a copy paste cod clone
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:20 UTC+1 No.78556131 Report

>>78555870
Taken to its logical conclusion, by your logic CIG should've released all stretch goal content in finished form the instant each stretch goal was met.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:25 UTC+1 No.78556471 Report

>>78552598
>implying it has brakes at all
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:28 UTC+1 No.78556671 Report

>>78556048
>no shots of the Not-Mako
>no shots of the Not-Merlin

Was that really too much to ask for
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:30 UTC+1 No.78556873 Report

>>78556131
>>78556108
No,but it would be nice of them to actually release what they promise instead of adding more stuff.

I've read they plan to have 100+ ships in the game,and yet they haven't finished the ships they've already promised,they keep redesigning the old ones-such as the constellation,and they have ships that are nothing more than vague picture fantasies.

Also,they haven't made it where you can fly around a planet yet,No FPS gameplay yet, only 100 people in an instance...

The list goes on.I had really high hopes for this game,but I'm afraid it's going to flop hard.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:30 UTC+1 No.78556885 Report

>not wanting to use a retaliator as a space dragster
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:36 UTC+1 No.78557350 Report

>>78556873
SQD42 and PU are going to be rolling updates m8. they are gonna push launches as soon as they can. Ships will come out as time goes. CR sees it like CIG is a corporate dungeon master rolling out the adventure as players do things.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:37 UTC+1 No.78557431 Report

>>78556873
>No,but it would be nice of them to actually release what they promise instead of adding more stuff.

That's contradictory. The 890 Jump IS more stuff.

>Also,they haven't made it where you can fly around a planet yet,No FPS gameplay yet, only 100 people in an instance...

That haven't should probably be a have right? The Murray Cup map is just that, a map. It's not an entire planet and there's no atmosphere.

>The list goes on.I had really high hopes for this game,but I'm afraid it's going to flop hard.

Your bait is terrible. 0/10.

Try again, this time with less shitty grammar and punctuation.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:38 UTC+1 No.78557453 Report

>>78556873
>only 100 people in an instance
you're just not making sense anon. The early goals like the Jump were the biggest and loftiest ones, it's only natural it takes them longer to churn those out than the fucking towel for example. Have some patience, or don't, CIG doesn't give a shit.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:39 UTC+1 No.78557537 Report

>>78557350
>>78557431
>>78557453
>replying to really shitty bait

Successful bait is successful I guess.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:41 UTC+1 No.78557653 Report

>>78556873
>>78557537
I don't care about the bait, it's the lack of spaces after a comma that really trigger me.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:41 UTC+1 No.78557665 Report

>>78556873
They havnt added more stuff for millions of dollars, what are you smoking?
> only 100 people in an instance
This isnt the kind of game where yodu ever even fucking get that many outside of incredibly rare circumstances anon.
Your 'concerns' sound like the same stupid crap people have been spewing for years now about how [wild conjecture and assumptions] means its gonna fail horribly, just you wait and see!
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:43 UTC+1 No.78557808 Report

>>78557653
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:43 UTC+1 No.78557851 Report

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4VsdfdZfyc
post racing music
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:46 UTC+1 No.78558035 Report

>>78557851
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctdUDUgxIqs

I don't care if it's cheating
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:47 UTC+1 No.78558136 Report

>>78558035
This is genuinely pretty nice.
Is the rest of this soundtrack that good?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:48 UTC+1 No.78558212 Report

>>78558136
Eh, it's alright. Some are great, others less so

I wouldn't say any are bad, just mediocre
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:52 UTC+1 No.78558485 Report

>>78558212
eh, damnit. well if we're being semi serious now, hideki naganuma did the stuff for some sonic game once. The JSRF guy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVIDbkJRzWo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sinZBE_Gdp8
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:53 UTC+1 No.78558573 Report

>>78557851
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I970aWYDCYI

You're all welcome.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:53 UTC+1 No.78558606 Report

we sanic?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TF4oUJcTfVI
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)06:56 UTC+1 No.78558807 Report

>>78558606
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlrJN3PG_m4
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)07:25 UTC+1 No.78560894 Report

>Posting SPEED music
>Not posting RACING music
Time to rectify that
http://youtu.be/TN36CetQw6I
http://youtu.be/kKpROWUdQxw
http://youtu.be/wKixyLza3D8
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)07:26 UTC+1 No.78560947 Report

>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)07:39 UTC+1 No.78561909 Report

alright time for some gofast weebfaggotry

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvTH7J2shuI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMDxKRx10mU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcMc7YJ9e2E
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)07:41 UTC+1 No.78562041 Report

>>78560894
Speed is an integral part of racing
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)07:50 UTC+1 No.78562578 Report

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6_ikWlJu_0

The only song to race to.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)07:51 UTC+1 No.78562670 Report

>>78556048
>https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/apmj51ok8v1iar/source/JumpPoint_02-08_Aug_14_The-Stars-Align.pdf

He's mixing up the Taurus and Aquila all over the place.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)07:53 UTC+1 No.78562848 Report

>>78555491
This goes for SC as a whole not just 1 ship.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)07:59 UTC+1 No.78563215 Report

>>78561909
>not GUMI
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)08:08 UTC+1 No.78563676 Report

>>78560894
what the shit, is that some metal growl in smash bros? Guy sounds like the vocalist from G.I.S.M.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMvLvsdBzuE

good racing tunes too, if you're into that

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxGtA9nRGRg

and some japanese speed metal for kicks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOM1G4VfNT4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwUmo8un22I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gmoktj-QYlM

>>78563215
Gumi ain't fast, nigga
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)08:14 UTC+1 No.78564020 Report

>>78563676
Nah, man, it's from F-ZeroX, it just so happens to be better quality in the Smash Bros rip than the N64 rip.

http://youtu.be/yyPtM9Mdlyo
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)08:25 UTC+1 No.78564695 Report

>>78492670
>Good

This is why no one likes you, Plax

hue
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)08:26 UTC+1 No.78564732 Report

>>78564020
I had no idea f-zero was so hardcore. for nintendo anyway
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)08:27 UTC+1 No.78564838 Report

>>78564695
do you come in here just to ctrl+f your name? fuck off retard
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)08:39 UTC+1 No.78565517 Report

>>78564838

I love you too, anon.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)08:39 UTC+1 No.78565525 Report

g-guys, I got an avenger. did I fuck up? ;_;
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)08:42 UTC+1 No.78565651 Report

PSA: GOOD RACING MUSIC DOESN'T HAVE VOCALS.

THANK YOU FOR LISTENING AND GOOD DAY.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)08:43 UTC+1 No.78565736 Report

>>78565525
No you did good, relax and stay calm.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)09:21 UTC+1 No.78567736 Report

https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/166500/retaliator-as-a-cargo-ship-for-250-bring-back-our-bomber-retaliator-owners-sound-off/p1

Weow, whiny ret owners mad that they won't get the most OP ship in the game. I bet they expected to be able to bomb a dozen ships all by themselves.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)09:30 UTC+1 No.78568163 Report

>>78567736
I got a song for them
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8uj7EwCk84
oh wait they don't get bombs
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)09:34 UTC+1 No.78568419 Report

>>78567736

At least it's not as bad as these faggots.

https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/172498/should-the-cig-team-get-the-weekend-off-poll-included

Apparently, most of those faggots have yet to understand that some, if not all, of the dev team are backers themselves and that they're most likely getting overtime and holiday pay.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)09:37 UTC+1 No.78568554 Report

Are there any racing orgs from 4chan yet?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)09:47 UTC+1 No.78569034 Report

scorpion jacket when?

i want to be a real human bean racer
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)09:55 UTC+1 No.78569391 Report

>>78562670

The Aquila is the Taurus dumbass.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)09:57 UTC+1 No.78569467 Report

>>78568554
SANIC
Vedline
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)09:58 UTC+1 No.78569523 Report

>>78568554

>Needing an org for racing

Unless you're going to design tracks, set rules and have a prize pool what would be the point?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)09:59 UTC+1 No.78569582 Report

>>78569391
no it's not what the fuck is wrong with you
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:03 UTC+1 No.78569786 Report

>>78569467

Thanks, I'll be applying to Sanic
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:03 UTC+1 No.78569793 Report

>>78569582

It says right at the beginning that before the names were finalised the Aquila was Taurus and the cargo variant was Aquarius, and the notes have always been recorded during development
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:09 UTC+1 No.78570082 Report

>>78556048

>Damage workflow

I'm not the only one who can't hear a pathetic mexican accent in my head while reading it am I? So many spelling and grammar mistakes it's disturbing.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:11 UTC+1 No.78570167 Report

Cutlass variants never edition.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:15 UTC+1 No.78570404 Report

>>78570082

>I worked on...
>I worked on...
>I worked on...

It reads like an infant's essay
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:21 UTC+1 No.78570658 Report

>>78570167
whoa. is that in the JP? also,
>filename
>'search & rescue' plane
>has 'actual search & rescue' variant
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:27 UTC+1 No.78570903 Report

>You bought a 350r
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:29 UTC+1 No.78570981 Report

>>78570167
Does their need to be variants for every single fucking ship? like the aroura, free lancer and connie make sense, hornet and 300i maybe, but everything else is specialised for a reason and it'd be stupid.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:30 UTC+1 No.78571041 Report

This jump point is so 2 weeks ago.

Enough of these stupid Connie variants, show us something new you slowfuck faggots.

>'maybe we'll show the Idris again next time'

HOW BOUT NO.
GET THE DAMN THING IN THE HANGAR ALREADY.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:30 UTC+1 No.78571061 Report

>>78570981

Everything needs variants because it would be incredibly shitty if a handful of ships exclusively were modifiable, it would render all the other ships effectively useless and only AI would bother with them.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:33 UTC+1 No.78571191 Report

>>78570981

I agree, in terms of variants I can see minor mods such as the turret being swapped out for something else and specialized internal components and equipment, but nothing too drastic. I can't really see Drake trying to compete with RSI or Origin on the luxury front. Maybe an explorer, S&A, and militia version.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:35 UTC+1 No.78571302 Report

>>78571191

samefag here

Then again, I'm not too sure. Maybe a specialized cockpit, cargo bay, etc. It doesn't really look like you can do a lot with the Cutlass hull
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:45 UTC+1 No.78571754 Report

>see aquarius logo on concept taurus

Someone at the office obviously enjoys pic related.

Aquarius skin when
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:45 UTC+1 No.78571780 Report

>>78571061
they don't need out of the box variants to be modifiable
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:46 UTC+1 No.78571814 Report

>>78571780

>They don't need aftermarket modified ships to be modifiable
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:52 UTC+1 No.78572079 Report

>>78555129
>someone good actually drew anime girl playing star citizen

I-is there m-more?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:55 UTC+1 No.78572239 Report

>>78572079

Considering that's Vivian I doubt it, she was concepted only last week after all.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:56 UTC+1 No.78572282 Report

>>78572239
expecting these shitters to know who Vivian is
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:57 UTC+1 No.78572305 Report

>>78572239
>vivian
literally who?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:58 UTC+1 No.78572357 Report

>>78572305
Vivian James, newfag.

http://imgur.com/a/qTzfw
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)10:59 UTC+1 No.78572374 Report

>>78572305
Vivian is /v/'s girl they concepted for a feminist studio to make games with.

Basically a tumblrette on /pol/ started spreading that /v/ aught to donate to feminist companies to piss off Anita and the dumb fucks fell for it.

This is the result.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:03 UTC+1 No.78572541 Report

>>78555129

Holy shit, look at all that technical detail. Headphone rest, Fiio DAC/amp, oculus DK2, Left joystick is not a throttle for muh 6DOF...
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:03 UTC+1 No.78572554 Report

>>78572374

Something something major burn.
It was funny seeing SJW get BTFO because someone one-upped them by actually doing something instead of throwing a galactic sized bitch fit on Twitter but like everything else retards are trying to warp it into a meme so they can use it as another icon to be socially accepted and therefore have their whiny opinions change da wurld.

But hey maybe people will start to realise the 1% aren't worth paying attention to when "ohhh right that's not what I was thinking of, no fuck em then."
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:04 UTC+1 No.78572594 Report

>>78572305

Here, you RSI shitter

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/vivian-james
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:04 UTC+1 No.78572603 Report

>>78572554
>Let's piss of feminists
>By donating to feminists
>GENIUS
No.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:05 UTC+1 No.78572641 Report

>>78572603

>Calling "SJW" feminists
>Missing the point

SJW =/= feminists, they're fucking insane
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:07 UTC+1 No.78572710 Report

>>78572374
>Basically a tumblrette on /pol/ started spreading that /v/ aught to donate to feminist companies to piss off Anita and the dumb fucks fell for it.

It was intended to divide and conquer, anon, and it worked pretty well. Twitter feminists have been getting red pilled in the last week or so. IA is getting ready to upload a new video this saturday I think.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:07 UTC+1 No.78572757 Report

>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:08 UTC+1 No.78572781 Report

>>78572641
Feminists are the literal death of society. They are were SJW's stem from and the source of all the bullshit in academia and the media.

If you don't fucking know this by now then you need redpilling son.

Donating to a feminist organization in order to piss off other feminists is retarded. It's like getting in between a fight of two of your most hated enemies when they turn on each other.

Just let them fucking rip on each other.

Instead you didn't add fuel to the fire, you supported the death of gaming, free media and free speech.

Good job nigger.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:13 UTC+1 No.78572987 Report

>>78572757
Gaaaaaaaaaaaaay
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:13 UTC+1 No.78572989 Report

>>78572781

Maybe judge TFYC by their actions and not by their label.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:13 UTC+1 No.78573008 Report

>mfw scrolling through the JP

Im actually a big fan of racing and motorsports and I couldnt give 2 fucks about the murray cup.

These cunts need to show more progress on the persistent universe.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:14 UTC+1 No.78573024 Report

>>78572781

>Support the death of gaming by crowdfunding a game

WELP STAR CITIZEN CONFIRMED FOR END OF ALL HUMANITY THEN
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:14 UTC+1 No.78573034 Report

>>78573008
>Im actually a big fan of racing and motorsports and I couldnt give 2 fucks about the murray cup.

Then you're not really a fan of racing.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:15 UTC+1 No.78573065 Report

>>78572989
TFYC believe that female devs have a harder time in the industry.

They believe that if you are a man you have a better chance of making games.

This is massive bullshit. Since the video games industry is the most cuckolded industry in existence at the moment.

If you support a company that makes games where only one sex can get a shot at it or where only one sexes ideals can be expressed then you are fucking scum.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:15 UTC+1 No.78573094 Report

>>78573008
I showed some progress to your mom.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:16 UTC+1 No.78573104 Report

>>78572781
>Just let them fucking rip on each other.

That was the intention behind donating to a feminist cause, anon. Feminists are now arguing amongst themselves because one side doesn't want them to accept 4chan's "dirty money". Meanwhile, the other side argues by refusing the money it's another form of oppression.

I encourage you to read up on it before posting about it.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:16 UTC+1 No.78573138 Report

>>78573065

Dude that's not the fucking point.
The point is it's a fucking sausage fest up in this bitch, and we need something to cheer this place up.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:16 UTC+1 No.78573140 Report

>>78573034
>this garbage
>racing

top kek.
This is literally the sort of shit you add deep into beta when the core game is done.

Im sure the genius in the CIG marketing department would disagree tho.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:18 UTC+1 No.78573203 Report

>>78573104

In other words, it's given /v/ and it's twitter allies the leverage they need to control the narrative and make the SJWs look like a bunch of crackpots
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:18 UTC+1 No.78573227 Report

>>78573140
>this garbage bait

Step it up sempai, this is weak shit.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:19 UTC+1 No.78573275 Report

>>78573104
>Hey guys we funded feminists but some other feminists think it's bad so we won xD
No.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:22 UTC+1 No.78573383 Report

>>78573275
You've gotten like 6 replies so i'll give you 5/10. Best I can do.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:22 UTC+1 No.78573391 Report

>>78573275

You don't seem to listen very well, anon. It's just one part to /v/'s ongoing war with the SJW shits in gaming journalism. Read up on divide-and-conquer
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:22 UTC+1 No.78573394 Report

>>78573227
>supporting a racing mode being implemented in an alpha which is barely managing dogfighting
>supporting a racing mode when the actual space sim part has barely had any work on it

If I wanted racing so desperately Id buy a dedicated racing game.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:25 UTC+1 No.78573578 Report

>>78573391
You're funding the enemy. You've already fucking lost.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:26 UTC+1 No.78573601 Report

>>78573394
>If I wanted racing so desperately Id buy a dedicated racing game.
>If I wanted dogfighting so desperately Id buy a dedicated dogfighting game.
>If I wanted FPS so desperately Id buy a dedicated FPS game.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:27 UTC+1 No.78573662 Report

>>78573578

I haven't funded shit, anon. I've been following the events as they unfold, and their tactics have had some success.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:27 UTC+1 No.78573671 Report

Can we have some real disccusion here for a second /scg/?

Okay.
To all the people that bought avengers, why? you knew from the start it was going to be a terrrible ship so why did you waste your money on it? if it's for looks then I guess that's understandable but it's a stupid utterly pointless reason, so you'd be to.

just why?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:28 UTC+1 No.78573728 Report

>>78457272
>Call of Duty in Space
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:29 UTC+1 No.78573736 Report

>>78573671
>I posted it again

It's not going to become a meme and they don't work like that anyway.

The process is organic, the more you try to force it the less it will work.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:30 UTC+1 No.78573801 Report

>>78573671

Hi dudebot
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:30 UTC+1 No.78573805 Report

>>78573671
>>78573736
WE ARE AWARE OF THIS SHITPOST

WE HAVE DEVELOPED CONTINGENCIES
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:30 UTC+1 No.78573823 Report

What's with all the bottom tier bait right now?

Is it because its the weekend? Do people lose all creativity?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:31 UTC+1 No.78573871 Report

>>78573601
>missing the point on purpose
>2/3 are core components of star citizen, the other is a novelty profession that barely compliments the rest of the universe

Cargo transport mode, Mining module, exploration mode,
you name it, theres a ton of shit higher on a space sim totem pole than fucking racing.

At least build a fucking map that can be used for the other modes instead of some faux-atmospheric set piece.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:33 UTC+1 No.78573981 Report

>>78573871
>I feel weak and impotent when game development doesn't go my way
>all I have left is to whine on an anonymous imageboard
>I secretly wish I had the courage to kill myself
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:35 UTC+1 No.78574043 Report

>>78573981
nice outing faggot.

>lel I dont have any arguments I was just trolling you xD
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:35 UTC+1 No.78574078 Report

>>78574043

>Literally slapping some rings in space
>2HARD IT'S A WASTE OF RESOURCES
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:36 UTC+1 No.78574125 Report

>>78574043
>I'm not the troll you are
>but seriously, please kill me I deserve to die
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:38 UTC+1 No.78574192 Report

>>78574043

Wrong faggot, anon. What you see as up higher on the totem pole is purely subjective. Besides, who the fuck wants to mine right now? Not only that, but we're a long way from the PU before we start any exploring.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:38 UTC+1 No.78574221 Report

>>78555129
she is even browsing /scg/...does this mean she will see herself in this thread and think she has an stalker?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:39 UTC+1 No.78574242 Report

>>78574078
As I said, actual rings in space would make more sense because you could put that into tdm and free4all.
Or hell, put the rings on the existing maps in 10 minutes.

No, they sat there and went E3 cinematic mode with Cloud City while the rest of the game is behind schedule.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:40 UTC+1 No.78574282 Report

>>78574242

>Implying it would literally go all the way up to SQ42 with just Blue and Orange space only

Yeah no I'm sure the planetside module team are nothing but a bunch of parasites all this time.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:41 UTC+1 No.78574348 Report

>>78574192
>fps space sim involving dogfights, trade and getting out of your ship to do shit
>subjective in comparison to racing

Next you'll tell me you never would have backed Star Citizen if they didnt have the Murray Cup.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:41 UTC+1 No.78574349 Report

>>78574242
If you weren't retarded I would tell you that the racing map was made by Foundry 42 in the UK not the PU team at Austin.

But sadly you are, so I won't.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:43 UTC+1 No.78574424 Report

>>78574348
>>fps space sim

First Person Shooter Space Sim?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:45 UTC+1 No.78574537 Report

>>78574348


FPS is still a ways off, anon. Racing doesn't look like it's a huge leap in terms of implementation and it helps to placate the masses until FPS is ready.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:46 UTC+1 No.78574561 Report

>>78574424
pretty much

>>78574349
And?
Did they have a bunch of time left over from all those capital ships finished and waiting for multi-crew.

I dont want to shit on those guys cause they do the most work, but whoever ordered their man-hours into racing is an idiot.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:47 UTC+1 No.78574634 Report

>>78574561
>And?

And you're retarded. It's right there in the post.

Though I understand the confusion given your disability.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:50 UTC+1 No.78574808 Report

>>78574634
>the PU is only made by Austin and noone else can contribute

Thats not how it works.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:52 UTC+1 No.78574907 Report

>>78574808
>despite the fact that CIG has told me that the studios are separating development I refuse to believe it in favor of my headcanon

I feel bad for you anon, I really do.

So lost and confused.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:54 UTC+1 No.78575039 Report

>>78574907
Yea, that was in the memo telling Behaviour to scrap their planetside work cause its connected to the persistent universe and infringing on Austin.

Totally forgot, sorry dude.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:55 UTC+1 No.78575110 Report

>>78575039
>sorry dude

That's okay, you're forgiven. You didn't ask to be retarded. It was thrust upon you.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)11:55 UTC+1 No.78575115 Report

>>78575039

>Planetside = Persistent Universe

So you can't separate logic from art? Okay.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:01 UTC+1 No.78575393 Report

>>78575115
Plans are plans.

Ships, Dogfighting, FPS, planetside, backend etc are all integral parts making up the persistent universe.

Racing is so far off removed, it would hardly be missed if the rest of the game got delivered.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:02 UTC+1 No.78575452 Report

>>78575110

Not the same anon you're replying to, but you seem rather spastic, anon. Why is that?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:03 UTC+1 No.78575510 Report

>>78575393

>Flight model physics is so far off removed, it would hardly be missed if the rest of the game got delivered.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:03 UTC+1 No.78575530 Report

>>78575452
>Not the same anon
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:06 UTC+1 No.78575695 Report

>>78575530

Somehow I can just see you, with a furrowed brow, sweat dripping from the side of your greasy head.

>that fucking anon, he's wrong, muh fucking autism will not allow this BLAHAHGHAHAGHAH
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:06 UTC+1 No.78575703 Report

>>78575510
>we cant have flight model physics without racing
>we cant have racing without an obnoxious cloud city map when we only have 2 actual space maps

Would be hilarious to see that proposal. Much better than the cynical suspicion that they just want to sell more racing ships early in alpha.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:07 UTC+1 No.78575774 Report

>>78575695
>not the same anon
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:09 UTC+1 No.78575843 Report

>>78575703
>>we cant have racing without an obnoxious cloud city map when we only have 2 actual space maps

it's just a map anon, y u hef to be so mad?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:12 UTC+1 No.78575987 Report

>>78575774

I'm really not, though lol
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:12 UTC+1 No.78575996 Report

>>78575843
Because I want the best damn space sim ever and not the best damn selling game ever.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:13 UTC+1 No.78576029 Report

>>78575996
>Because I want the best damn space sim ever

please don't quote that marketing bullshit

leave that for the forums
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:14 UTC+1 No.78576085 Report

>>78575843
>it's just a map anon, y u hef to be so mad?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:14 UTC+1 No.78576114 Report

>>78575996
It's one map in a development cycle that will last at least 2 more years.

Is that really worth maintaining this level of mad?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:15 UTC+1 No.78576147 Report

>>78576029
You're right, at this point SC wont ever reach that mark.

Id settle for a moderately good space mmo that has gets delivered on time.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:17 UTC+1 No.78576227 Report

>>78576147
>delivered on time

Get a load of this guy, he thinks anything SC related is going to be on time
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:19 UTC+1 No.78576353 Report

>>78576227
I give them till 2018 to have 75% of the star systems and overall PU done.
But ill bail out earlier if they keep spinning their tires like PGI.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:21 UTC+1 No.78576424 Report

>>78576353
Why not bail out now and save yourself the wait?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:23 UTC+1 No.78576503 Report

>>78576353
>But ill bail out earlier if they keep spinning their tires like PGI.

Can I have your stuff?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:24 UTC+1 No.78576548 Report

>>78576424
This is the last one.
The last game I allow myself to get obsessively hyped over.

Not like a PC gaming enthusiast has much choice in the current climate.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:24 UTC+1 No.78576575 Report

>>78571061
Variants actually seem like they make ships less moddable and/or is a method for inflating the ship count without really adding variety
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:26 UTC+1 No.78576665 Report

>>78576548
>The last game I allow myself to get obsessively hyped over.

You don't sound very obsessively hyped.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:26 UTC+1 No.78576667 Report

>>78576353
>2018
What?

Nigga this'll be done in a year.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:26 UTC+1 No.78576671 Report

>>78572603
Its pissed of SJW and games 'journalists'
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:28 UTC+1 No.78576738 Report

>>78576671
>still being baited
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:29 UTC+1 No.78576786 Report

>>78576503
Sure if you can afford it.

inb4 its worthless by then cause I leave it too late

>>78576665
Swings and roundabouts.
I give out praise and criticism when its appropriate.

Of course when it praise noone gives a shit.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:29 UTC+1 No.78576798 Report

>>78576575

I really don't see how it's more or less modifiable than any other ship or variant, just less point to modify it when it's already been bought tuned and pushed to the end of the line in a particular role.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:31 UTC+1 No.78576905 Report

>>78576786
>I give out praise and criticism when its appropriate.

I have no way to know that. All I see is you getting mad about one map.

So yeah.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:32 UTC+1 No.78576983 Report

I backed this thing a long time ago, i haven't been paying much attention to its development but what is it going to play like in the end? I only see some small death match, CTF and a racing mode(???) but none of actual gameplay.

My question just is:are there going to be acceleration gates everywhere and all zones are split into instances like in X3 or Freelancer or similar or is it going to be more organic.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:35 UTC+1 No.78577096 Report

>>78576798
I'm seeing it as a way to not work on components and moddability until PU has had a few releases, and get to '100 ships' while only making 30 or so ships.

I wanted to see Drake make a 1-man ship, or RSI make a cutlass-size ship, as well as some other manufacturers.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:37 UTC+1 No.78577163 Report

>>78576905
50% of released gameplay maps.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:37 UTC+1 No.78577196 Report

>>78576905
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:39 UTC+1 No.78577272 Report

>>78577163
>1 of 3
>50%

Nigga you high
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:41 UTC+1 No.78577348 Report

>>78576983

No acceleration gates, so like X3 but much bigger systems, better systems and nothing is useless, bugged or shit. Also cruise mode instead of very wonky SETA system.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:41 UTC+1 No.78577380 Report

>>78577272
Just woke up.

Point is still that a high proportion of maps are wasted on what will be shitty racing, bases on experience with the closest analogue to racing with silly easy physics and weapons, GTAO.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:42 UTC+1 No.78577391 Report

>>78576983
>but what is it going to play like in the end?

Hold on while I check my crystal ball.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:43 UTC+1 No.78577449 Report

>>78576786
>>78576786
>Sure if you can afford it.

What do you have in your fleet? Maybe you're willing to part with 1-2 ships?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:43 UTC+1 No.78577464 Report

>>78576983
>but none of actual gameplay.

Fighting and flying space ships is not actual gameplay?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)12:48 UTC+1 No.78577680 Report

>>78577096
>I wanted to see Drake make a 1-man ship,

Drake Herald.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:10 UTC+1 No.78578849 Report

>>78577464

Gameplay is the wrong term for what i meant i guess. Gameflow would be more appropriate, maybe. It's like if WoW would show a lot of content from only battlegrounds, you still have no idea what the actual game is like.

It's just that when i look at their coverage of the game they speak of all kinds of complex systems like planetary exploration on foot and on land vehicles, FPS combat and ship capturing, multi-player ships etc etc. It's hard to imagine a way how all these thing will connect without looking like a complete mess or playing like shit, as was the case with walking in stations and Eve Online.
When they announced that everybody was super hyped as they hinted to the possibility of players being able to go and capture ships on foot as well, in the end they just scrapped all of it and now the only part where you walk around is your tiny ass apartment thing and even that controls like ass.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:16 UTC+1 No.78579154 Report

>>78578849

Either assume you're a faggot or you're completely clueless. You should start with that.

Hint: EVE is like 10 years old.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:19 UTC+1 No.78579351 Report

>>78578849
So these complex systems are impossible because......?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:24 UTC+1 No.78579579 Report

>>78578849
The entire reason that was scrapped for eve was because of the massive player backlash over an expansion that added next to nothing substantive. Eve is starting to run into another backlash because they've done little but rebalancing over the past several expansions and people want brand new shit to get hyped over. They want something to shake up the sov game, not just revised models, mordus ships, and rebalanced eagles.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:42 UTC+1 No.78580468 Report

>>78578849
Think bro. Eve was a spreadsheet simulator that tried to inject character control, something it was never designed to have. SC is built as an fps with vehicles on an engine developed for fps.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:47 UTC+1 No.78580717 Report

>>78580468
eve still hasn't given us character - character interaction

a shit
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:49 UTC+1 No.78580780 Report

Anything interesting in the new Jumppoint?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:50 UTC+1 No.78580823 Report

>>78580780
nawp. It's a shit.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:50 UTC+1 No.78580858 Report

>>78580780
Nothing really, just constellation variants, something something racing.

Boring.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:51 UTC+1 No.78580865 Report

>>78580780
The Connie has a ridiculously large amount of detail.

It's a good JP if you have any interest in 3D modelling.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:51 UTC+1 No.78580886 Report

>https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/172593/no-point-in-testing#latest
>EpicJohnson

RSI is really bad spotting bait.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:51 UTC+1 No.78580891 Report

>>78580780

Second racing cup confirmation and details. It's an unofficial one so it's pretty much anything goes. Starts with an icefield around an ice giant, then a dip in acid on a smog world's high atmosphere and a home stretch of weapons free straights.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:52 UTC+1 No.78580942 Report

>>78580886
>Going to RSI forums for any reason but to troll or be horrified at the hugbox
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:54 UTC+1 No.78581061 Report

So... when's 0.9?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:55 UTC+1 No.78581084 Report

>>78580942
>trolling the most oblivious community on the planet

If you're really really really bored, sure I guess.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:55 UTC+1 No.78581131 Report

>https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/172579/back-rub-victory-from-my-girl-friend-while-dog-fighting#latest

>hi guys I want to show off my girlfriend's tits
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:56 UTC+1 No.78581169 Report

>>78581084
better than blogging up to 3000+ posts
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:56 UTC+1 No.78581180 Report

>>78581061
2 weeks
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:57 UTC+1 No.78581209 Report

>>78581131
>At least he has one
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:57 UTC+1 No.78581232 Report

>>78581131
>Hurr wimminz

hesusito, look at that fucking ugly mug of hers
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:58 UTC+1 No.78581256 Report

>>78581180
Right.. Okay then. Uh. See you in 2 weeks.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:58 UTC+1 No.78581287 Report

>>78581131
the fuck happened to her face?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:59 UTC+1 No.78581306 Report

>>78581287
Botox?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)13:59 UTC+1 No.78581320 Report

>>78580717
I feel like its beyond them at this point. Their current team can only manage a handful of minor new features midst the little bit of rebalancing. At the rate they're going eve will need a new facelift by the time they finish this one.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)14:00 UTC+1 No.78581357 Report

>>78581061
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14111-Arena-Commander-V9-Status-Update
looks that like last time we're gonna get some daily updates on progress this week
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)14:00 UTC+1 No.78581375 Report

>>78581287
That meth addiction hasn't been kind to her
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)14:01 UTC+1 No.78581404 Report

>>78581209
>>78581232
>>78581287

Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the fact that he's posting tits. It's just weird how the RSI community can be so candid about their personal lives.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)14:02 UTC+1 No.78581476 Report

>>78581320
sad.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)14:03 UTC+1 No.78581507 Report

>>78581357
That's really depressing, I hope we get a proper update in 2 weeks.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)14:04 UTC+1 No.78581583 Report

>>78581507
should be a matter of few days, but as usual shit may happen
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)14:04 UTC+1 No.78581584 Report

>>78581320

I heard that any mention of SC in a positive light is forbidden on the Eve forums, yes/no?
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)14:04 UTC+1 No.78581591 Report

>>78581404
Well, they want to show off the fact that they in their minds, at least are mildly successful at life, and aren't complete shut-in neckbeards like most of us.
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)14:05 UTC+1 No.78581631 Report

>>78581528
>>78581528
>>78581528

New thread
>>
Anonymous 08/30/14(Sat)14:08 UTC+1 No.78581848 Report

>>78581584
I haven't been on the forums forever, back when I was it was the very beginning of sc's funding and people didn't give a shit.
All the content on this website comes from 4chan.org. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster. 4chanArchive is not affiliated with 4chan.